Answer:
The answer is "
and 157.5 MPa".
Explanation:
In point A:
The strength of its products with both the grain dimension is linked to this problem. This formula also for grain diameter of 310 MPA is represented as its low yield point

Here y is MPa is low yield point, x is mm grain size, and k becomes proportionality constant.
Replacing the equation for each condition:

People can get yo = 275 MPa with both equations and k= 15.5 Mpa
.
To substitute the answer,

In point b:
The equation is 
equation is:

by putting the above value in the formula we get the
value that is= 157.5 MPa
Answer:
A selective surface with large absorption for solar radiation and high reflectance for thermal infrared radiation was produced by use of surface oxidation of stainless steel. The surfaces were studied for use with concentrated light in a solar power plant at temperatures of 400°C and higher.
In order to investigate the relation between surface treatment and optical properties, stainless steels (AISI 304 and 430) which were submitted to different chemical and mechanical surface treatments, were used. To increase the spectral selectivity, these surfaces were treated in air and in vacuum at different temperatures and times. The optical properties of these films were investigated. Visual and infrared spectral absorptances were measured at room temperature. The thermal hemispherical emittance and absorptance were obtained by a calorimetric method at 200°C. It was noticed that these chemically and mechanically treated stainless steel surfaces have good spectral properties without further oxidations. This is very important for high temperature uses. The best values are found for samples 7 and 8 under vacuum and air. These two samples with mechanically ground surfaces retained their selectivity and specularity after several hours oxidation. One can conclude that the surface ground treatment confers good selectivity on the steel surfaces for use in concentrating solar collectors with a working temperature of 500°C.
Sample surfaces were subjected to long temperature ageing tests in order to gain some idea of the thermal stability of the surfaces. The results promise better-performing surface and the production of durable selective finishes at, possibly, lower cost than competing processes.
Explanation:
Answer:
4m/s
Explanation:
We know that power supplied by the motor should be equal to the rate at which energy is increased of the mass that is to be hoisted
Mathematically
\
We also know that Power = force x velocity ..................(i)
The force supplied by the motor should be equal to the weight (mg) of the block since we lift the against a force equal to weight of load
=> power = mg x Velocity........(ii)
While hoisting the load at at constant speed only the potential energy of the mass increases
Thus Potential energy = Mass x g x H...................(iii)
where
g = accleration due to gravity (9.81m/s2)
H = Height to which the load is hoisted
Equating equations (ii) and (iii) we get
m x g x v = 
thus we get v = H/t
Applying values we get
v = 6/1.5 = 4m/s
Answer:
a) 28 stations
b) Rp = 21.43
E = 0.5
Explanation:
Given:
Average downtime per occurrence = 5.0 min
Probability that leads to downtime, d= 0.01
Total work time, Tc = 39.2 min
a) For the optimum number of stations on the line that will maximize production rate.
Maximizing Rp =minimizing Tp
Tp = Tc + Ftd
At minimum pt. = 0, we have:
dTp/dn = 0
Solving for n²:
The optimum number of stations on the line that will maximize production rate is 28 stations.
b)
Tp = 1.4 +1.4 = 2.8
The production rate, Rp =
The proportion uptime,