I would choose count of electron shells and count of valence electrons. The electron configuration of each element is fixed and can be used to determine the element's identity. By counting the electron shells, you can have an idea which part of the periodic table the mystery element lies, and by determining the number of valence electrons (outermost shell), you can pinpoint the exact identity of the mystery element.
Here is your answer:
Theirs 12 protons, 12 electrons, and 14 neutrons!
Reason: When you look at the atomic number for any element on the table with all of the elements that's how many protons, and electrons their are in the substance (or element) you find how many neutrons by rounding the number under the atomic number which will equal 14!
Your answer is 12:12:14
It’s going to take significantly less energy to heat Land V.S. Water. It’s also a different heat transfer process. Hope this helps
Explanation:
⁶⁵₃₀Ca → ⁶⁵₂₉Sc + ⁿₓH
The reaction above is nuclear reaction.
In a nuclear reaction, the mass number and atomic number must be conserved.
The mass number is the superscript before the atom
Atomic number is the subscript before the atom
Conserving mass number:
65 = 65 + n
n = 0
conserving atomic number:
30 = 29 + x
x = 1
The unknown atom is a positron i.e a positively charged electron: ⁰₁e
⁶⁵₃₀Ca → ⁶⁵₂₉Sc + ⁰₁e
learn more:
Transmutation brainly.com/question/3433940
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
- <u><em>B. Negative association</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
<em>Negative association</em> is when the independent and dependent variables move in opposite directions: if the dependent variable increases, the independent variable decreases, and if the dependent variable decreases, the independent variable increases.
As you see in the diagram, as you move to the right on the horizontal axis, meaning that the independent variable is increasing, the points lie lower, meaning that the independent variable decreases.
Therefore, if you draw a line of best fit, it will have a negative slope. A negative slope indicates <em>negative association.</em>
The graph certainly shows association as there is a clear trend; else the points would be randomly dispersded.
