3.45mm3
Mark brainliest please
Hope this helps you
The answer is, 0.6. To get that answer you have to divide 20 and 12. 20 is dividend, and 12 is tge divisor.
Answer:
Y= x + x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
X represents large tshirts
Using Laplace transform we have:L(x')+7L(x) = 5L(cos(2t))sL(x)-x(0) + 7L(x) = 5s/(s^2+4)(s+7)L(x)- 4 = 5s/(s^2+4)(s+7)L(x) = (5s - 4s^2 -16)/(s^2+4)
=> L(x) = -(4s^2 - 5s +16)/(s^2+4)(s+7)
now the boring part, using partial fractions we separate 1/(s^2+4)(s+7) that is:(7-s)/[53(s^2+4)] + 1/53(s+7). So:
L(x)= (1/53)[(-28s^2+4s^3-4s^2+35s-5s^2+5s)/(s^2+4) + (-4s^2+5s-16)/(s+7)]L(x)= (1/53)[(4s^3 -37s^2 +40s)/(s^2+4) + (-4s^2+5s-16)/(s+7)]
denoting T:= L^(-1)and x= (4/53) T(s^3/(s^2+4)) - (37/53)T(s^2/(s^2+4)) +(40/53) T(s^2+4)-(4/53) T(s^2/s+7) +(5/53)T(s/s+7) - (16/53) T(1/s+7)
Answer:
a. yes
b. no
c. yes
d. yes
Step-by-step explanation:
For a, 27 + 38 can be broken apart. 27 is broken up by adding smaller numbers (20 + 7 = 27) and the same is done with 38 (30 + 8 = 38), so A and C shows a way to add 27 and 38. In C, the numbers are just put into a different order. B is not a way to add 27 and 38, because the sum is different.
27 + 38 = 65, however 20 + 70 + 38 = 128. The addition problem for D is a way to solve for 27 + 38, because it is broken up differently than A and C. They instead added the 20 and 30 together first, then split up 15 (from 8+7) into 10 and 5. So D is a way to solve, because it gets the same answer as 27 and 38 :D
