Answer:
$3,842.78
Explanation:
We must determine the future value of the money invested and then calculate the difference between both return rates. We can use the future value formula: FV = present value x (1 + return rate)ⁿ
3.5% ⇒ FV = $238,000 x (1 + 3.5%)³ = $238,000 x 1.035³ = $263,874.85
4% ⇒ FV = $238,000 x (1 + 4%)³ = $238,000 x 1.04³ = $267,717.63
difference = $267,717.63 - 263,874.85 = $3,842.78
The answer is "Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic".
Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic is Three (3) years experience specifically identified with the scientific procurement and examination of computerized gadgets including yet not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones while utilized by a law authorization office or enterprise.
Successfully complete an aggregate of forty (40) hours preparing course(s) for the measurable obtaining and investigation of hard drives, tablets or potentially PDAs given by an affirmed office, association or organization.
Give an account report itemizing your experience got from the measurable obtaining and investigation of computerized gadgets including however not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones of no less than ten (10) scientific cases while utilized by a law implementation office or company.
In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
