Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(x+3)² -5 =0 , use the formula (a+b) ² = a²+b²+2ab
x²+9 +6x -5 =0 , combine like terms
x²+6x +4 =0, use the quadratic formula x = (-b±√b²-4ac)/2a
x= (-6 ±√6²-4*1*4)/2*1
x= (-6 ± √36-16) /2
x= (-6±√20)/2
x=(-6 +2√5)/2 and x=( -6-2√5) /2, factor 2 in the numerator and simplify
x= -3 +√5 and x= -3 -√5
Fractions
We are going to be checking each statement in order to find which of them are correct:
<h2>5/6 < 6/8 - 5/6 is smaller than 6/8</h2>
We can see that in the drawing 3/8 is smaller than 5/6. Then this statement is false.
<h2>
4/6 < 5/8 - 4/6 is smaller than 5/8</h2>
We can see that in the drawing 5/8 is smaller than 4/6. Then this statement is false.
<h2>
2/6 = 3/8 - 2/6 is equal to 3/8</h2>
We can see that in the drawing 3/8 is bigger than 2/6. Then this statement is false.
<h2>
3/6 = 4/8 - 3/6 is equal to 4/8</h2>
We can see that in the drawing 4/8 is equal to 3/6. Then this statement is true.
<h2>
Answer: 3/6 = 4/8</h2>
Answer:the answer is 44
Step-by-step explanation: cuz 40 divided by 90%= 44
The total cost is given by the equation:
C(t) = 45 + 25(h-1) where h is the number of hours worked.
We can check for each option in turn:
Option A:
Inequality 5 < x ≤ 6 means the hour is between 5 hours (not inclusive) to 6 hours (inclusive)
Let's take the number of hours = 5
C(5) = 45 + (5-1)×25 = 145
Let's take the number of hours = 6
Then substitute into C(6) = 45 + (6-1)×25 = 170
We can't take 145 because the value '5' was not inclusive.
Option B:
The inequality is 6 < x ≤ 7
We take number of hours = 6
C(6) = 25(6-1) + 45 = 170
We take number of hours = 7
Then C(7) = 25(7-1) + 45 = 195
Option C:
The inequality is 5 < x ≤ 6
Take the number of hours = 5
C(5) = 25(5-1) + 45 = 145
Take the number of hours = 6
C(6) = 25(6-1) + 45 = 170
We can't take the value 145 as '5' was not inclusive in the range, but we can take 170
Option D:
6 < x ≤ 7
25(6-1) + 45 < C(t) ≤ 25(7-1) + 45
170 < C(t) ≤ 195
Correct answer: C
