Answer: The federal bureaucracy has a huge influence on policymaking and its rule making process is explained below.
Explanation:
The federal bureaucracy carry out three main tasks in government which are administration, implementation, and regulation. Bureaucrats put the policies of government into practice. The federal bureaucracy has a huge influence on policymaking. For policies to be passed, the bureaucracy works with the president and the Congress.
The federal bureaucracy develops rules that affect the operation of programs, and the rules must be adhered to. There are stages in the Rule-Making process. When Congress passes new laws, series of rules are proposed which are presented in the Federal Register. The parties interested can give their opinion on the rules. After the final regulation is published by the agency, the rules are then enforced after sixty days. During the waiting period, the rules can be adjusted by the Congress. If no changes are made, the rules become effective at the end of sixty days.
Answer: B. Notice of termination is made known to parties indirectly related to an agency agreement.
Explanation:
The constructive notice is a legal term that reflects that someone has the knowledge of an event or transaction due to reasonable facts. The notice is kept in the public record. The principle on the basis of the premise that indicates that someone cannot deny the knowledge of the fact because the official duty will inquire about it.
B is the correct option this is because the parties are made aware indirectly about the notice. This can be done by publication of the agreement in the news paper in the area where the agreement exists.
He said that the story of an old one he objective
Biological explanations are sometimes used in order to explain the reasons for a crime. However, although this might appear to be a good idea on the surface, it can actually carry a great variety of problems. When we accept biological explanations, we are giving great respect and consideration to science. Although this is not necessarily bad, excessive respect for science can make us this that this is objective, when it is not. It can also make us forget that scientific interpretations can be polluted due to bias, misunderstandings and misinterpretation of evidence, to name a few. This could affect policy development, policing, and the adjudication of offenders, as scientific concerns would be placed much higher up than ethical or social concerns.
