1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dahasolnce [82]
3 years ago
15

A 66.0−kg short-track ice skater is racing at a speed of 10.0 m/s when he falls down and slides across the ice into a padded wal

l that brings him to rest. Assuming that he doesn't lose any speed during the fall or while sliding across the ice, how much work is done by the wall while stopping the ice skater?
Physics
1 answer:
dexar [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

3300J

Explanation:

Work done is the energy that is lost by the skater

Formula for workdone = 1/2*mV^2

m = 66kg

V = 10m/s

Work done = 1/2 * 66 * 10^2

= 3300J

You might be interested in
Which process will be MOST AFFECTED by the heat?
Alex Ar [27]
The answer is precipitation
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the rankine degree represent a larger or smaller temperature unit than the kelvin degree
zvonat [6]
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice, larger.

Rankine is Fahrenheit + 460 , while Kelvin is Celsius + 273. We all know that Fahrenheit has larger number compared to kelvin , thus rankine is much larger.
Hope my answer would be a great help for you.    If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
8 0
3 years ago
Consider the following hypotheses: 12:V ) >(x)) Use rules of inference to prove that the following conclusion follows from th
Igoryamba

Answer: See attachment below

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The Big Bang is considered a scientific theory. Why is this true?
Kitty [74]

Answer:

Explanation:In the natural sciences we make observations and construct models.

If those models are consistent with our observations then we can make predictions from those models and test them against more observations.

If some observations contradict our models, then we can tell that our models are wrong or in need of modification.

For example, Newton's laws of physics provide pretty good models sufficient in accuracy to allow us to calculate how to land a man on the moon. Are they therefore true? Not exactly. Newton's laws fail to work well at velocities approaching the speed of light. So we can tell that they need some adjustment.

Einstein's special and general theory of relativity provide more accurate models. So are they true? They predict all sorts of strange behaviour which we have actually observed. They seem to provide useful models, but they do not explain everything. For example, the extreme conditions in a black hole or those we think existed at the start of the universe provide some challenges to General Relativity.

From a practical perspective it is useful to operate within theoretical frameworks that we treat as facts. We need to make assumptions in order to reach substantial conclusions. So we often act as if something like Big Bang theory is a fact, but we cannot know it to be so.

Essentially in any natural science we cannot prove anything to be true. We can demonstrate that theories are false. This is the honesty of science.

Consider an alternative theory: The universe and everything you "know" actually started  

10

minutes ago.

You may protest that you remember what you did yesterday. In my theory I can explain that these are simply implanted memories, not real. What about radiometric dating? What about the Andromedra galaxy being  

2.5

million light years away, so the light we see from it started travelling in our direction  

2.5

million years ago? In my theory I can claim that these are all an elaborate implanted fiction.

There is no way to prove that this theory is true and probably no way to prove that it is false.

5 0
4 years ago
A 5.18x10^4 kg railroad car moves on a frictionless horizontal rails until it hits a horizontal spring stopper with a force cons
nalin [4]

Answer:

The initial velocity of the cart was 0.91m/s.

Explanation:

When the car comes to a stop it has delivered all of its kinetic energy to the spring; therefore,

\dfrac{1}{2}kx^2 = \dfrac{1}{2}  mv^2

solving for v we get:

v = x\sqrt{\dfrac{k}{m} },\\

we put in k = 4.21*10^{5}N/m, m = 5.18*10^{4}kg, and x = 0.32m to get:

v = (0.32m)\sqrt{\dfrac{4.21*10^5}{5.18*10^4} },\\

\boxed{v = 0.91m/s.}

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • A feather is dropped on the moon from the height of 1.4m. The acceleration of gravity on the moon is 1.67ms-1. Determine the tim
    11·1 answer
  • How does the velocity change with time in uniform rectilinear motion of an object?
    7·1 answer
  • Beach mice that live inland are usually darker in color than those that live on the sandy beaches along the coast. Which of thes
    12·1 answer
  • Which quality is desirable for a radioisotope that is used for medical imaging of a specific organ? Check all that apply. half-l
    12·2 answers
  • What is the value of work done on an object when a 50–newton force moves it 15 meters in the same direction as the force?
    7·1 answer
  • Neutron stars are extremely dense objects that are formed from the remnants of supernova explosions. Many rotate very rapidly. S
    8·1 answer
  • What stresses can you experience in nursing
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that two objects attract each other with a gravitational force of 50N. If the mass
    5·1 answer
  • Write down 4 situations where magnets are used in our daily life​
    15·1 answer
  • Light waves reflect off the objects that you see. Where do those light waves originate?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!