1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
3 years ago
6

Edwin says that when (x + 2)2 = 49, that x + 2 = 7.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Darya [45]3 years ago
4 0

it would be true because 7*7 would be 49

You might be interested in
What is the answer for this but only 1 ANSWER? ​
earnstyle [38]
Factored: 4 ( a + 2c - 2)
Standard form/simplified : 4a + 8c - 8
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The vertices of a parallelogram are A(x1, y1), B(x2, y2), C(x3, y3), and D(x4, y4). Which of the following must be true if paral
Iteru [2.4K]

The answer is really none of the above, because all of these have divisions by difference in x, and there are perfectly fine rectangles where those will mean dividing by zero.

To do the problem the way they want us to, we note segments with the same slope are parallel (or collinear); segments with slopes which multiply to -1 are perpendicular.

Let's figure out what each choice is trying to tell us by translating it into parallel and perpendicular. Remember A is point 1, ...

A. ((y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)= (y_3-y_2)/(x_3-x_2)) and ((y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)×(y_3-y_2)/(x_3-x_2))=-1

translated, that's CD║BC and CD⊥BC - contradictory; second half right

B. (y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)= (y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1) and ((y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)×(y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1))=-1

CD ║ AB and CD ⊥ AB - only the parallelogram half is right

C. (y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)= (y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1) and (y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)×(y_3-y_2)/(x_3-x_2)=-1

CD║AB and CD⊥BC - that's TRUE

D. (y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)= (y_3-y_1)/(x_3-x_1) and (y_4-y_3)/(x_4-x_3)×(y_2-y_1)/(x_2-x_1)=-1

CD║AC and CD⊥AB - nope

Answer: C

The way I'd get the proper expression is with the dot product.

A parallelogram is a rectangle when adjacent sides are perpendicular. It only takes one right angle to make them all right.

Two sides are perpendicular when the dot product of their direction vectors is zero. All the answers have y_4 - y_3 so one side is CD. The other side must be BC or AD; AD would give y_4 - y_1 terms which don't appear among the answer, so let's go with BC.

The direction vectors are

D-C = (x_4 - x_3, y_4 - y_3)

C-B = (x_3 - x_2, y_3 - y_2)

For perpendicularity we need a zero dot product:

0 = (D-C)\cdot(C-B) = (x_4 - x_3)(x_3 - x_2) + (y_4 - y_3)(y_3 - y_2)

- (x_4 - x_3)(x_3 - x_2) = (y_4 - y_3)(y_3 - y_2)

That's the correct expression, given it's a parallelogram, to demonstrate it's a rectangle. The divisions make it iffy.

8 0
3 years ago
On a sheet of paper, you have 100 statements written down.
serg [7]

Answer:

50

Step-by-step explanation:

If the first statement its true (At most 0 of the statements are true), there are not true statements in the paper. So, the first statement its false.

Now, if the first statement its false, this mean there must be at least 1  true statement in the paper.

Now, if the second statement its true ( at most 1 of the statements are true) this implies that the third statement its true (if "at most 1" its true, then "as most 2" must be true).

If any statement (besides the first) its true, then all the statement that follows it must be true.

The first non false statement, then, must be the statement made by the person 51:  "At most 50 statements are true"

And the 49 statements that follows are true as well.

5 0
3 years ago
Find 2 consecutive odd integers sum of who's square is 290​ pls send fast
ELEN [110]

Answer:

<h3>Hence required integers are 11 and 13</h3>

Let x an odd positive integer

Then, according to question

x^2 +(x+2)^2=290

2x^2 +4x−286=0

x^2 +2x−143=0

x ^2+13x−11x−143=0

(x+13)(x−11)=0

x=11 as x is positive

Hence required integers are 11 and 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it is helpful....

7 0
3 years ago
Cody said that dividing a unit fraction by a whole number is the same as multiplying the unit fractions by a unit fraction with
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi, the statement is true, because to divide a fraction we have to turn the second fraction upside down and multiply them. Since a whole number x can be written as x/1, it also applies to the case of dividing a fraction by a whole number.

We can prove it with an example.

Dividing a unit fraction by a whole number  

1/2 ÷ 2 = (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4

Multiplying the unit fractions by a unit fraction with a whole number as a denominator

1/2 x 1/2= (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Classify the number -61.
    15·1 answer
  • What is 12 and 3/4 as a decimal
    13·1 answer
  • Please answer asap!!..
    12·2 answers
  • 4 out of 5 marbles are red
    14·1 answer
  • Q # 18 Find the midpoint of. A B
    8·1 answer
  • Tom compared \dfrac{2}{12} 12 2 ​ start fraction, 2, divided by, 12, end fraction and \dfrac{7}{6} 6 7 ​ start fraction, 7, divi
    5·2 answers
  • What percentage of Adults purchased Fast Pass Access Tickets?
    11·1 answer
  • Calculate the missing amounts for companies a to e
    5·1 answer
  • A 1 16 -3<br> b 2 16 3<br> c 1 12 -3<br> d 1 -16 -2
    13·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE will give brainlinest
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!