Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
8 times 1/4 equals 2
if this is wrong i am so sorry
First, put the equation of the line giveninto slope-intercept form by solving fory. You get y = 2x +5, so the slope is –2.Perpendicular lines have opposite-reciprocal slopes, so the slope of theline we want to find is 1/2. answer y=-1/2
Answer and Step-by-step explanation:
Simply just adding and subtracting.
8 - 1 - 6 + 5 = 6
-2 + 6 - 3 - 4 = -3
-- 4 is 3 away from 7. The answer is positive 3.
-- The answer is negative 5.
-- The answer is positive 1.
-- The answer is 0.
-- The answer is negative 7.
-- The answer is -25.
-- The answer is 64.
-- The answer is 32.
-- The answer is 80.
-- The answer is -43.
-- The answer is 95.
-- The answer is 26
<u><em>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</em></u>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.
