McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.
Answer: $610 million
Explanation:
M1 includes currency in circulation, checkable bank deposits and traveler's checks.
M1 = $100 million + $500 million + $10 million = $610 million
Savings deposits is part of M2
The term which describes the individual use of products that can lead to externalities is "consumption externalities."
<h3>What is consumption externalities?</h3>
There may be possible costs and advantages experienced by other parties who were not engaged in a transaction that when an individual investor or party engages in some transaction, such as using a good or service. They are referred to as externalities.
There are two types of externalities, which are-
- The positive externality is really an unintended advantage gained by a third party as a result of the creation or use of a commodity by another party. Positive externalities show that the societal advantages of creating or consuming products outweigh the individual advantages to third parties.
- The negative externality would be an indirect expense incurred by a third party as a result of the creation or use of a product by another party. Negative externalities show that the societal costs are greater than the private costs to third parties.
To know more about externalities, here
brainly.com/question/14018373
#SPJ4
Answer:
The division's Return on Investment (ROI) is 180%
Explanation:
The computation of the return on investment is shown below:
= (Operating income) ÷ (total assets) × 100
= ($1,800,000) ÷ ($1,000,000) × 100
= 180%
The return on investment shows a relationship between the operating income and the total assets / investment.
The other information which is given in the question is not consider in the computation part. Hence, ignored it