BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)

1 answer:

7 0

I think I would agree on horses, just because you can take them for lessons, ride them treat them like a pet. Donkeys you can’t ride but you can have as a pet. Horses you can make money off, like races, but aren’t influenced. You can rent out horses to people that don’t have anywhere to place them.

You might be interested in

Consider the reaction between hydrogen gas and chlorine gas to form hydrogen chloride gas in a closed cylinder with a movable pi

d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

In this case, the system doesn't be affected by the pressure change. This means that nothing will happen

Explanation:

We can answer this question applying the Le Chatelier's Principle. It says that changes on pressure, volume or temperature of an equilibrium reaction will change the reaction direction until it returns to the equilibrium condition again.

The results of these changes can define as:

Changes on pressure: the reaction will move depending the quantity of moles on each side of the reaction

Changes on temperature: The reaction will move depending on if it's endothermic or exothermic

Changes on volume: The reaction will move depending the limit reagent and the quantity of moles on each side of the reaction

In the exercise, they mention a change on pressure of the system at constant temperature (that means the temperature doesn't change). As Le Chatelier Principle's says, we must analyze what happens if the pressure increase or decrease. If pressure increase the reaction will move on the side that have less quantity of moles, otherwise, if the pressure decreases the reaction will move to the side that have more quantity of moles. In this case, we can see that both sides of the equation have the same number of moles (2 for the reactants and 2 for the products). So, in this case, we can conclude that, despite the change on pressure (increase or decrease), nothing will happen.

3 0

3 years ago

When comparing the two chair conformations for a monosubstituted cyclohexane ring, which type of substituent shows the greatest

Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

See the explanation

Explanation:

In this case, we have to keep in mind that in the monosubstituted product we only have to replace 1 hydrogen with another group. In this case, we are going to use the methyl group $CH_3$ .

In the axial position, we have a more steric hindrance because we have two hydrogens near to the $CH_3$ group. If we have more steric hindrance the molecule would be more unstable. In the equatorial positions, we don't any interactions because the $CH_3$ group is pointing out. If we don't have any steric hindrance the molecule will be more stable, that's why the molecule will the equatorial position.

See figure 1

I hope it helps!