Answer:
humans? i believe it would be because we're mammals.
1) 0.0011 rad/s
2) 7667 m/s
Explanation:
1)
The angular velocity of an object in circular motion is equal to the rate of change of its angular position. Mathematically:

where
is the angular displacement of the object
t is the time elapsed
is the angular velocity
In this problem, the Hubble telescope completes an entire orbit in 95 minutes. The angle covered in one entire orbit is
rad
And the time taken is

Therefore, the angular velocity of the telescope is

2)
For an object in circular motion, the relationship between angular velocity and linear velocity is given by the equation

where
v is the linear velocity
is the angular velocity
r is the radius of the circular orbit
In this problem:
is the angular velocity of the Hubble telescope
The telescope is at an altitude of
h = 600 km
over the Earth's surface, which has a radius of
R = 6370 km
So the actual radius of the Hubble's orbit is

Therefore, the linear velocity of the telescope is:

The answer is Infrared. The infrared of the electromagnetic spectrum is most of earth's outgoing terrestrial radiation. <span>Earth is the hot body with temperature of 30 degrees on the average.</span>
Answer:
Stars are at large distances that even light takes thousands of years to reach us from there.
for example, alpha centauri is 4300 light years away from earth and it is considered the nearest star to us, this means that light from there takes 4300 years to reach us and with a spaceships that can move with the speed of light is would take us 4300 years to get there which is imposible to live for that long.
hence, it is difficult to move between the stars.
Let both the balls have the same mass equals to m.
Let
and
be the speed of the ball1 and the ball2 respectively, such that

Assuming that both the balls are at the same level with respect to the ground, so let h be the height from the ground.
The total energy of ball1= Kinetic energy of ball1 + Potential energy of ball1. The Kinetic energy of any object moving with speed,
, is 
and the potential energy is due to the change in height is
[where
is the acceleration due to gravity]
So, the total energy of ball1,

and the total energy of ball1,
.
Here, the potential energy for both the balls are the same, but the kinetic energy of the ball1 is higher the ball2 as the ball1 have the higher speed, refer equation (i)
So, 
Now, from equations (ii) and (iii)
The total energy of ball1 hi higher than the total energy of ball2.