Because according to the third amendment people have the right not to quarter soldiers in a time of peace without consent
I am not sure but my best guess is <span>b. a group of people who mostly agree on the best way to achieve certain goals in government
</span>
Answer:
A) Dedicated resources for compliance of standards.
Explanation:
As per the question, all the given options could be regarded as 'effective compliance program policies' except for the 'few dedicated resources for compliance of standards' in the matters of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act as they are significant to ensure the standards of FCPA. The other three options display quite beneficial compliance program policies as 'experienced personnel in compliance functions' help in the effective functioning of the policies, 'the independence of compliance personnel in management' provide them with enough authority to make decisions and 'unclear reporting structure for compliance personnel' assists in producing effective reports. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
sex-discrimination
Explanation:
According to my research, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Martha succeeded in eliminating sex-discrimination by opening up her institution to all genders. The other institution was discriminating women by not letting them learn to sail, so by doing what Martha did she not only eliminated sex-discrimination but will most likely obtain a large clientele that has no other options than going to Martha's institution.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
