Answer:
The correct answer is False.
Explanation:
This statement is false, since the residual theory of dividends argues that these are irrelevant, that is, that the value of the company is not affected by its dividend policy. The main drivers of this theory are Modigliani and Miller. Both authors affirm that the value of the company is determined solely by the profitability and the degree of risk of its assets (investments), and that the way in which the organization divides its income between dividends and reinvestment does not have a direct effect on its value .
However, some studies show that significant changes in dividends affect the price of shares in the same direction, that is, increases in dividends translate into increases in stock prices, and vice versa. In response, M and M propose that the positive effects of dividend increases be attributed, not to the dividend itself, but to the informational content of dividends with respect to future income. Thus, any increase in dividends would cause investors to raise the price of the shares, while a decrease would cause a corresponding decrease in the price of the shares.
<span>If the firm decides to increase the number of shirts by 100 units, the opportunity cost will be 200 pants. If the firm is at point E and decides to increase the production of shirts by 500 units, the opportunity cost will be 400 pants.</span>
First, we calculate for the effective annual interest given the interest in the scenario.
ieff = (1 + i/m)^m - 1
Substituting the values,
ieff = (1 + 0.04/12)^12 - 1 = 0.0407
The effective interest is equal to 4.07%.
The future amount after 2 years,
F = ($6000) x (1.0407)^2 = $6498.86
Setting a goal, reaching it, and then setting a bigger goal is a characteristic trait of a Self-motivated Entrepreneur.
