
The expression you would substitute for x is -2y+4. The answer is d.
Answer:
C. (3x2 - 10) (x - 2)
Step-by-step explanation:
3x^2 - 16x +20
Step 1: Sum = - 16x
Product = 60x^2
Step 2: Find 2 numbers that their sum is -16 and their product is 60. If you do that correctly, then you will get two numbers: 10 and -6
Step 3: Replace -16x with the two numbers found in step 2, then you will have; 3x^2 - 6x - 10x + 20
Step 4: Factorise the equation in step 3, like so;
(3x^2 - 6x)(- 10x + 20)
3x(x - 2) -10(x - 2)
(3x - 10)(x - 2)
To check if the answer is correct, expand the bracket: (3x - 10)(x - 2)
If the bracket is opened properly, you will get 3x^2 - 16x + 20
Step-by-step explanation:
Since both lines intersect each other 3 units above the x-axis, the y-value of the point of intersection must be 3.
Looking at the options, (-3, 5), (3, -2) and (0, -3) are all invalid points.
Answer:
At the end of the day 797 lockers were closed.
Step-by-step explanation:
So first of all you need to find out how many even numbers there are from 1-900 (which is 450) so you know that 450 are open. In the 3 multiplication tables every second number is even so you know that half of the 450 lockers that was opened was closed again: this meant that 225 lockers remained open.
You also know that every number in the 4 multiplication tables is the second number in the 2 multiplication tables so half of them are closed but you also know that the 900th locker was opened so now you have 113.
So to conclude you do 900-113 which gives you 797 (this is because 113 is the amount of lockers that is open)
Answer: D.) This is an example of inductive reasoning because a general conclusion is reached based on a specific example,
Step-by-step explanation: Inductive reasoning simply refers to making conclusion about a specific subject or topic from patterns or insights derived from related examples. In the scenario above, the conclusion reached encompasses the overall full time 4 years college student. However, this conclusion was inferred based on a specific example comprising of only a randomized sample of 1200 full time 4 years college students in 100 campuses. random. The example failed to incorporate every student, Hence, the conclusion is induced as the choice of a sample of students may not convey the choice or decision of all.
Deductive reasoning meanwhile follows that a generally established fact is used to make conclusion about a specific example.