When the results of a new experiment to test atomic theory do not agree with the theory, scientist will repeat the experiment to make sure that his results are reliable.
Explanation:
In the scientific context, each new experiment must be performed with precision and following the steps of the scientific method.
An experiment that does not provide reliable data to demonstrate a theory must be reviewed in detail and performed again to confirm the data obtained in the first attempt.
A theory is a postulate that tries to explain a natural phenomenon, but whose argument can be discussed or does not have the acceptance of a law. When the theory is proven and there are no arguments against it, it can be universally accepted and becomes a law.
The other options are not valid due to:
<u><em>Scientists worldwide will reject atomic theory because of the new results</em></u><em>. A theory cannot be discarded without solid arguments or evidence in order to dismiss it and establish a new one.</em>
<u><em>The scientist will change his results to agree with the accepted theory</em></u><em>. This would be an unethical procedure and unacceptable to the scientific community.</em>
<em><u>Other scientists will reject the results because they do not agree with the theory</u></em><em>. The opinion of other scientists is not enough to dismiss a theory, if it has a valid scientific basis.</em>
Aluminum's outer electron in 3p-orbital is slightly further from the nucleus and protected by 3s-orbital. This causes it to need less energy. Magnesium's outer electron is closer and not protected by an outer orbital. Hope This Helps and Ged Bless!
If the reaction is a chemical change, new substances with different properties and identities are formed. This may be indicated by the production of an odor, a change in color or energy, or the formation of a solid.
