<h3>
Answer: There is only one answer and it is choice B</h3><h3>Angle 1 and angle 4 are alternate interior angles</h3>
========================================================
Explanation
- A. This is false because it should be angle 4 + angle 5 = 180 without the angle 6. Adding on angle 6 results in some angle larger than 180. Note how angle 5 = (angle 3)+(angle 6).
- B. This is true and useful to showing that the three angles of a triangle add to 180 degrees. This is because you'll use the fact that angles 4, 5 and 6 combine to 180 degrees.
- C. While this is a true statement by the exterior angle theorem, it is not useful to the proof. It is better to state that angle 2 and angle 6 are congruent because they are alternate interior angles.
- D. Like choice C, it is true but not useful. It's better to say that angle 1 is congruent to angle 4. See choice B above.
Note how it's not enough for a statement to be true. It also needs to be relevant or useful to the context at hand. A more simpler example of this could be stating that x+x = 2x.
Answer:
C and D
Step-by-step explanation:
They are both right
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Reduction to normal from using lambda-reduction:
The given lambda - calculus terms is, (λf. λx. f (f x)) (λy. Y * 3) 2
For the term, (λy. Y * 3) 2, we can substitute the value to the function.
Therefore, applying beta- reduction on "(λy. Y * 3) 2" will return 2*3= 6
So the term becomes,(λf. λx. f (f x)) 6
The first term, (λf. λx. f (f x)) takes a function and an argument, and substitute the argument in the function.
Here it is given that it is possible to substitute the resulting multiplication in the result.
Therefore by applying next level beta - reduction, the term becomes f(f(f(6)) (f x)) which is in normal form.
