Answer:
- Acetic acid (CH₃COOH) and hydronium ion (H₃O⁺)
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, based on the acid-base theory which states that acids are known as H⁺ donors, if we consider the direct reaction:

It is clear that the acetic acid is the first H⁺ donor as it losses one H⁺ to turn into the acetate ion. Moreover, if we consider the inverse reaction:

It is also clear that the hydronium ion is the second H⁺ donor as it losses one H⁺ to turn into water.
Best regards.
Answer:
The atoms become cations because they have lost electrons and the atoms and has a positive charge then atoms become a ions because they have gained electrons from cations and has a negative charge
Complete Question
You determine that it takes 26.0 mL of base to neutralize a sample of your unknown acid solution. The pH of the solution was 7.82 when exactly 13 mL of base had been added, you notice that the concentration of the unknown acid was 0.1 M. What is the pKa of your unknown acid?
Answer:
The pK_a value is
Explanation:
From the question we are told
The volume of base is 
The pH of solution is 
The concentration of the acid is 
From the pH we can see that the titration is between a strong base and a weak acid
Let assume that the the volume of acid is 
Generally the concentration of base

Substituting value


When 13mL of the base is added a buffer is formed
The chemical equation of the reaction is

Now before the reaction the number of mole of base is
![No \ of \ moles[N_B] = C_B * V_B](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=No%20%5C%20of%20%5C%20moles%5BN_B%5D%20%20%3D%20%20C_B%20%2A%20V_B)
Substituting value

Now before the reaction the number of mole of acid is

Substituting value


Now after the reaction the number of moles of base is zero i.e has been used up
this mathematically represented as

The number of moles of acid is


The pH of this reaction can be mathematically represented as
![pH = pK_a + log \frac{[base]}{[acid]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pH%20%20%3D%20pK_a%20%2B%20log%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Bbase%5D%7D%7B%5Bacid%5D%7D)
Substituting values

This idea has historical significance. The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus (born 460 BCE), who held that everything is composed of small particles moving in empty space, is credited with developing the first hypothesis we have about the microscopic universe. He had some concrete proof for this, such the fact that items like a new loaf of bread or a rose may give off a scent even when they are far from the source. Being a materialist, he thought that these odors originated from actual material particles released by the bread or the rose, rather than being purely a type of magic. He reasoned that these particles must float through the air, with some of them maybe landing in your nose where you can smell them immediately. This still makes sense in modern times. But many of us now have quite different perspectives on these "particles."
Thank you,
Eddie
The magnitude of a star as it would appear to a hypothetical observer at a distance of 10 parsecs or 32.6 light-years. This rates how visible celestial bodies are when they are all viewed from the same distance. Luminosity: The brightness of a star in comparison with that of the sun.