Answer:
1.10
Explanation:
The computation of portfolio's beta is shown below:-
= Stock A Beta × Invested in Stock A ÷ Total value + Stock B Beta × (Total value - Invested in Stock A) ÷ Invested in Stock A
= 0.75 × $47,500 ÷ $100,000 + 1.42 × ($100,000 - $47,500) ÷ $100,000
= 0.75 × $47,500 ÷ $100,000 + 1.42 × $52,500 ÷ $100,000
= 0.75 × 0.475 + 1.42 × 0.525
= 0.35625 + 0.7455
= 1.10175
or
= 1.10
Therefore for computing the portfolio beta we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
the adjustment for estimated uncollectible accounts will require
b. Debit to Bad Debt Expense for $10,000.
Explanation:
There are two primary methods for estimating bad-debt expense. The first is an income-statement approach that measures bad debt as a percentage of sales.
Accout receivable at the end_ 80000
Credit sales_______________400000
Estimate________________ 2,50%
Debit bas debt expense______10000
Answer:
What happens to the wealth effect of a change in the aggregate price level as a result of this allocation of assets?
- The consumers' wealth effect will rise since the slope of the aggregate demand curve increases as the prices of assets increases, i.e. the slope of the aggregate demand curve becomes steeper as customers become wealthier.
Will aggregate demand still be downward sloping? Why or why not?
- The aggregate demand curve sill still be downward sloping because as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity demanded will still decrease. An inverse relationship exists between price changes and quantity demanded.
In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
Based on the amount paid for the tickets and their fair value, the portion that is entitled to <u>charitable contribution deduction</u> is $75.
When one buys a ticket to a charitable event, there is a chance that some of the ticket price can be treated as a charitable contribution deduction.
The part that can be treated as such is anything in excess of the fair value of the ticket. This amount in this case is:
= 200 - 125
= $75
In conclusion, the answer is $75.
Find out more on <u>charitable contribution deductions</u> at brainly.com/question/8706786.
