Answer:
<u>Liberalism</u>
Left-wing, federalist. Prefer more regulation and services like free universal health care to be provided by the government to all citizens.
Government should provide more services to the less fortunate (like health care) and increase taxes if necessary. High-income earners should pay a larger percentage of their income as taxes.
<u></u>
<u>conservatism</u>
Right-wing, anti-federalist. Prefer smaller government, less regulation, most services to be provided by the private sector in a free market, and a literal interpretation of the Constitution.
Government should tax less and spend less. Cutting spending to balance the budget should be the priority. Higher income earners should have an incentive to invest (credits). Charity is the responsibility of the people.
<span>One source of conflict are "personal" differences.
</span>
Indeed, we are generally extraordinary individuals, so it bodes well that we will all have contrasts, correct? Indeed, we are regularly attracted to other people who have some particular contrasts from us. The familiar maxim expresses that "opposites are drawn toward each other", which is regularly valid. The issue is that distinctions that draw us together can now and again turn into a wellspring of contradiction.
Hi there
The correct answer is option D.
Limited resources have the largest impact on opportunity cost.
Consumers who need limited resources have the biggest impact on opportunity costs.
These consumers want finished products within a limited period of time.
They have to make best use of the limited opportunities which are available to lesser people who need bigger resources.
Hope this helps!
-WeasuLL
Please Give Brainliest. It Really Helps
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the options for this question.
However, trying to help you we can comment on the following.
The statement that best explains how the Compromise of 1850 attempted to resolve debates over the expansion of slavery is "The compromise allowed California to join the United States as a free state but would allow slavery in southwestern territories."
Under the compromise of 1850, the territories that we're able to choose by popular sovereignty whether or not to allow slavery were New Mexico and Utah.
The United States had defeated the Mexican Army in the Mexican-American War that started in 1846 and ended in 1848. With the victory, the United States got new big portions of land that belonged to México. But many disputes started in the US about the issue of slavery in the territories. That is why under the Compromise of 1850, the government allowed New Mexico and Utah to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while California entered the Union as a free state.
