Answer:
biology is not a physical science, as physical sciences deal with nonliving things such as atoms and whatnot. biology is a biological science
Explanation:
The options are all related, and the answer is D) All of the Above.
The synergistic effects of exposure to multiple toxins are more difficult to quantify and study. As a result, there is not sufficient research on how much a system can take when exposed to multiple pollutants. This lack of research also means that we often do not even know what the effect of these interactions between multiple toxins are.
As a result of these gaps in our knowledge of the interactions between toxins, it is difficult to evaluate the threshold for pollutants, since a system will rarely feature only one pollutant in isolation.
Analogous. This means they share a similar function (flight) but do not have the same embryonic origin.
According to an answer from another and a bit of my own research;
A decomposer is exactly what it sounds like, an organism that decomposes something and feeds off of it. You can eliminate the answers "Owl" and "Hawk" from a first glance as they are both consumers. Looking at it again, an "Ant" is <em>not </em>a decomposer, but rather, a consumer just like your other two options. This leaves "Fungus", something that decomposes it's food.
Please forgive me if I'm wrong. Feel free to ask for more information and I will scour the internet to see what I can find. <3
<u>[bloominginthedark/bloom]</u>