Heat required to raise the temperature of a given system is

here we know that
m = mass
s = specific heat capacity
= change in temperature
now as we know that
mass of wood = 5 kg
mass of aluminium pan = 2 kg
change in temperature = 45 - 20 = 25 degree C
specific heat capacity of wood = 1700 J/kg C
specific heat capacity of aluminium = 900 J/kg C
now here we will find the total heat to raise the temperature of both




So heat required to raise the temperature of the system is 257500 J
Imagine you are in a swimming pool 30m deep. Assuming you know that water is denser than air, you would know that the 30m of water above you will carry more weight, and press down on your body. Say you were in a swimming pool 60m deep, you would be sandwiched between 30m of water pressing down on you, and the upthrust created by the 30m of water below you.
In a building 30m up, the pressure will be regulated, as you are in a building. The floor will be strong enough to support the weight of the body, and the body will not recoil into itself.
See
K.E=1/2(mass*velocity²)
so option B is the correct answer.
Brainliest pls :-)
Answer:
The inventors claim is not real
a) No the the freezer cannot operate in such conditions
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The power input is 
The rate of heat transfer 
The temperature of the freezer content is 
The ambient temperature is 
Generally the coefficient of performance of a refrigerator at idea conditions is mathematically represented as

substituting values


Generally the coefficient of performance of a refrigerator at real conditions is mathematically represented as

substituting values


Now given that the COP of an ideal refrigerator is less that that of a real refrigerator then the claims of the inventor is rejected
This is because the there are loss in the real refrigerator cycle that are suppose to reduce the COP compared to an ideal refrigerator cycle where there no loss that will reduce the COP