I think c would be the answer
It isn't heart healthy. That's something that's not true.
Answer:
Removal of all of the direct identifiers from the data at the earliest.
Explanation:
- It is to be noticed that the extra shields are expected to ensure the welfare and privileges of the subjects or members who will probably be defenseless against undue impact, intimidation, for example, youngsters, detainees, human babies, pregnant ladies, individuals with the psychological issue or educationally and financially burdened people.
-
The potential identifiers incorporate , social security no., name, address, email address, health record, contact numbers and 14 other standard identifiers as expressed in the research data framework.
- When the study of the research is exposed to arrive at a decision, as a piece of extra measure of safety the every single direct identifier are expelled from the data at the earliest opportunity to maintain a strategic distance from any conceivable security rupture that could possibly prompt any damage against the powerless.
The answer would be the third choice, <u>a study printed by the American Health Association.
</u><u />Hope this helps :)<u>
</u>
