Answer:
Txomin lifted the stone with greater mass. (Txomin levantó la roca con mayor fuerza).
Explanation:
The sportsman that lifts the stone with a greater mass needs a higher force (El deportista que levanta la piedra con mayor masa necesita una mayor fuerza):
José
![F = (200\,kg)\cdot \left(9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}} \right)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%20%28200%5C%2Ckg%29%5Ccdot%20%5Cleft%289.807%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E%7B2%7D%7D%20%5Cright%29)
![F = 1961.4\,N](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%201961.4%5C%2CN)
Txomin
![F = (220\,kg)\cdot \left(9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}} \right)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%20%28220%5C%2Ckg%29%5Ccdot%20%5Cleft%289.807%5C%2C%5Cfrac%7Bm%7D%7Bs%5E%7B2%7D%7D%20%5Cright%29)
![F = 2157.54\,N](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%20%3D%202157.54%5C%2CN)
Txomin lifted the stone with greater mass. (Txomin levantó la roca con mayor fuerza).
Wow ! I understand your shock. I shook and vibrated a little
when I looked at this one too.
The reason for our shock is all the extra junk in the question,
put there just to shock and distract us.
"Neutron star", "5.5 solar masses", "condensed burned-out star".
That's all very picturesque, and it excites cosmic fantasies in
out brains when we read it, but it's just malicious decoration.
It only gets in the way, and doesn't help a bit.
The real question is:
What is the acceleration of gravity 2000 m from
the center of a mass of 1.1 x 10³¹ kg ?
Acceleration of gravity is
G · M / R²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ N·m²/kg²) · (1.1 x 10³¹ kg) / (2000 m)²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ · 1.1 x 10³¹ / 4 x 10⁶) (N) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ (kg · m / s²) · m² · kg / kg² · m²
= 1.83 x 10¹⁴ m / s²
That's about 1.87 x 10¹³ times the acceleration of gravity on
Earth's surface.
In other words, if I were standing on the surface of that neutron star,
I would weigh 1.82 x 10¹² tons, give or take.
Finding out the acceleration 12/3 = 4m/s^2
thus it is descending so the actual acceleration would be 9.8-4 = 5.8 m/s^2
the weight will be 90*5.8 = 522 N
522/9.8 = 53.2 kg
Answer:
The zero field location has to be on the line running between the two point charges because that's the only place where the field vectors could point in exactly opposite directions. It can't be between the two opposite charges because there the field vectors from both charges point toward the negative charge.
Answer:
We know that pole is the point where the strength of the magnet is maximum. So more and more iron particles will be attracted at poles of a magnet when we bring a magnet near the iron particles. We will observe the crowdness of particles at the ends of magnet. This indicates the presence of two poles in a magnet. Hence poles are present in a magnet in pair. If a magnet is divided into two parts, each part also possesses a pair of poles.
Two properties of a magnet are: A magnet always has two poles: north pole and south pole. Like magnetic poles repel each other and unlike magnetic poles attract each other.