In general, the further away an electron is from the nucleus, the easier it is for it to be expelled. In other words, ionization energy is a function of atomic radius; the larger the radius, the smaller the amount of energy required to remove the electron from the outer most orbital. For example, it would be far easier to take electrons away from the larger element of Ca (Calcium) than it would be from one where the electrons are held tighter to the nucleus, like Cl (Chlorine). Hope this helped a little not the exact answer though :)
Answer:
To understand the utility in sequence comparison and in the search for proteins that have a common evolutionary origin, you need to be clear about some concepts about how to evolve proteins. The idea that is accepted is that throughout the evolution some species are giving rise to new ones. Behind this is the genetic variation of organisms, that is, the evolution of genomes and their genes, as well as the proteins encoded by them.
Explanation:
Three ways can be distinguished by which genes evolve, and by proteins: mutation, duplication and shuffling of domains. When differences between homologous protein sequences are observed, these differences change to do with the way of life of the organism, an example of this, bacteria that live in hot springs at very high temperatures have proteins with a very high denaturation temperature, and these proteins are usually richer in cysteines. On the other hand, the fact that in positions of the sequences they remain unchanged (preserved positions), means that these have a special importance for the maintenance of the structure or function of the protein and its modification has not been tolerated throughout of evolution
Answer:
no.
Explanation:
The reason this has
never happened is due to the source of magnetic fields: moving electric
charges. When electric charges (e.g. electrons) move in circles, they
produce a magnetic field. In a piece of iron, it is very easy to line up
these circles, getting all the little magnets to work together as one big
magnet.
For each of these circles, one side is the north pole and one side is the
south pole. Since each circle has two sides, each circle has a north and a
south pole. Even the smallest possible magnets (spinning electrons) have a
north and a south pole.
Answer:
The answer to your question is: 24 grams of D
Explanation:
To answer this question we need to remember the Lavoisier law of conservation of mass, which says that in a chemical reaction matter is neither created nor destroyed.
This means that the amount of matter stays the same.
Then, the reaction is
A + B ⇒ C + D
26 g 12 g 14 g x
mass
of reactants 38 g ? mass of products, but it must be
equal to the mass of products
Then 14g + x = 38
x = 38 - 14
x = 24 g of D
Answer:
the first energy level is closest to nuclear the second energy level is a little farther away than the first
