Answer:
In the range of diseconomies of scale
Explanation:
Economies of scale refers to a concept whereby a firm accrues cost advantage owing to it's increased scale of production.
Economies of scale points towards efficient production.
Conversely, Diseconomies of scale refers to the phase wherein a firm experiences cost disadvantages owing to increase in organizational operations and output level.
Reasons for operation of this phase being, lack of motivation and proper coordination between employees since there are too many employees and management gets difficult.
In the given case, as the corporation decreased it's inputs, the output fell less proportionately which means the firm was earlier operating in the phase of diseconomies of scale.
The answer is: D - Debit Cash; credit John, Capital.
Explanation:
The entry records the investment of cash by John, owner of a sole proprietorship is: Debit Cash; credit John, Capital.
Answer:
A. Reject (Alternative 1) $0.00
Accept (Alternative 2) $1.12
Differentials Effect on income (Alternative 2) $1.12
B. Accepted (Alternative 2)
Explanation:
a. Preparation of a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Reject (Alternative 1) or Accept (Alternative 2)
March 16
Reject Accept Differentials Effect on income
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2) (Alternative 2)
Revenue per unit $0.00 $7.20 $7.20
Costs:
Variable manufacturing costs per unit
$0.00 -$5.00 -$5.00
Export tariff per unit
$0.00 -$1.08 -$1.08
($7.20*15%=$1.08)
Income (Loss) per unit $0.00 $1.12 $1.12
b. Based on the above differential analysis
the special order should be ACCEPTED (Alternative 2).
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
None of the options seem to be correct.
Stakeholder is the people who are interested in the the decision made by an organization. When a change takes place in an organization, the stakeholders are affected by such change. Stakeholders include board, managers, shareholders, workers etc.
The first option is wrong as stakeholders are incidental to the change process. They're always ever present in the change process.
The second option is wrong as well. Some stakeholders are decision makers and can influence the potential outcome of organizational restructuring. e.g board etc.
The third option is also incorrect. This is because stakeholder expertise in managing change should be considered by change leaders in the planning of adaptable organizational structures. Some stakeholders are expertise in change management and their knowledge is needed when there is planning of adaptable organizational structures.
That means we're left with only the Fourth option which is the right answer.
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Monumental can discharge the contract by frustration. In order for a contract to be discharged by frustration, four conditions have to occur:
- An unforeseeable event must occur: In this case the zoning changes were unforeseeable.
-
No party is at fault: the zoning board made the changes to the zoning of the land.
- Performance is impossible: there is no reason why an office building should be built in a residential only area.
- The result is radically different than expected: neither Monumental or Champion Builders expected a zoning change to occur.
