There are 3 3/4 pounds of bricks in a bag. Each brick weighs 5/8 of a pound. How many bricks are in the bag.
1 answer:
Answer: There are 6 bricks in the bag.
Step-by-step explanation:
Convert from mixed number to decimal number. To do it, divide the numerator of the fraction by the denominator and add the result to the whole number part. Then:
Convert from fraction to decimal number. To do it you need to divide the numerator by the denominator. Then, you get:
Let be "x" the number of bricks in the bag<em>.</em>
<em> </em>Based on the information given in the exercise, you can set up the following proportion:
Finally, you must solve for "x" in order to find its value. This is:
You might be interested in
The correct answer is option B which is the actual product is about StartFraction 1 over 18 EndFraction less than the estimate.
<h3>What are fractions?</h3>The fraction is defined as the division of the whole part into an equal number of parts. here we have the following information Vassil rounded to the nearest half to estimate the product of Five-eighths and StartFraction 8 over 9 EndFraction.
E = = 0.55
Thus the product of the fraction estimated in the nearest half is,
0.5×1= 0.50
Therefore the correct answer is option B which is the actual product is about StartFraction 1 over 18 EndFraction less than the estimate.
To know more about fractions follow
#SPJ1
Answer:
20*30km = 600km
15*30km = 450km
600km * 450km = 270000 km^2
Step-by-step explanation:
assuming 1cm --- 30km causes that 2cm --- 60km, 3cm --- 90km, 4cm --- 120km etc. Notice that number of km's is 30 times greater than the number of cm's on a map
using this logic, you calculate both real dimensions of Colorado by multiplying 20*30 = 600 km and 15*30 = 450km
Then we use a formula of an area of a rectangle assuming
and get
which is an actual area of Colorado
The table is not clear, so i have attached it.
Answer:
z statistic is -2.26
This is less than our alpha level,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans
Step-by-step explanation:
From the attached table, we can see that;
first-generation hispanic americans; (N = 899 and percentage = 43%
second-generation hispanic americans; N = 351 and percentage = 50%
first-generation asian americans; (N = 2,684 and percentage = 58%
second-generation asian americans; N = 566 and percentage = 51%
Z-score formula in this case is;
z = (p1^ - p2^)/(√(p^(1 - p^)((1/n1) + (1/n2))
Where;
p^ = (p1 + p2)/(n1 + n2)
For, hispanic americans we have;
p1^ = 0.43 × 899 = 386.57
p2^ = 0.5 × 351 = 175.5
p^ = (386.57 + 175.5)/(899 + 351)
p^ = 0.45
Thus;
z = (0.43 - 0.5)/(√(0.45(1 - 0.45)((1/899) + (1/351))
z = -2.26
From z-distribution table, we have;
P-value = 0.01191
Since we have 2 samples, then probability = 2 × 0.01191 = 0.02382
This is less than our alpha level of 0.05,therefore we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the proportion of homeowners between first generation and second generation Hispanic Americans.
