1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
4 years ago
10

On a separate sheet of paper, write equations for

Chemistry
2 answers:
Softa [21]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

1.) HCl + KOH mr -> KCl + H2O

2.) H2SO4 + Ba(OH)2 -> BaSO4 + 2H2O  

3.) H3PO4 + 3NaOH -> Na3PO4 + 3 H2O

Explanation:

blondinia [14]4 years ago
3 0
Wakanda seeking revenge on h20
You might be interested in
Please help it’s a test due in five minutes! I’ll give 10 points
barxatty [35]

Answer: negative acellaration or mass.

Explanation:

the first reason why is that i got that quistion right. and when objects are unbalanced it gives negative acellaration

3 0
3 years ago
Water (2150 gg ) is heated until it just begins to boil. If the water absorbs 5.91×105 JJ of heat in the process, what was the i
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Initial temperature of water was 34,3°C

Explanation:

The heat absorbed in the process (Q) can be written as:

Q = mcΔT

Where the heat is 5,91x10⁵J, m is mass of water (2150g), c is specific heat of water (4,184J/g°C). And ΔT is change in temperature (100°C - x). Replacing:

5,91x10⁵J = 2150g×4,184J/g°C×(100°C - x)

5,91x10⁵J = 899560J - 8995,6J/°Cx

-3,0856x10⁵J = - 8995,6J/°Cx

34,3°C = x

Thus, <em>initial temperature of water was 34,3°C</em>

I hope it helps!

3 0
3 years ago
What might happen when a gas is exposed to a small flame?
Verizon [17]

Answer:

The fire may grow bigger, depending on the gas.

Explanation:

If you expose more air to a small flame then it could grow larger because air keeps fire alive.

3 0
3 years ago
How many microliters are in 1 L? I n 20 mL?
pshichka [43]
1 liter= 1,000,000 microliters
20 mL= 20,000 microliter

I hope this helped ;)))
4 0
4 years ago
Baking soda mixed with vinegar produces carbon dioxide and water. The best way to prove that no mass was lost during this reacti
lord [1]

Given what we know, we can confirm that the best way to prove that no mass was lost during the reaction would be to follow option C and determine the masses of all substances before and after the reaction.

<h3>Why is this the best method?</h3>

This method provides two sets of data in order to draw a comparison. The other option will either not produce comparable data, or do not take into account all of the elements being produced.

Therefore, by comparing the mass of baking soda and vinegar before the reaction to the mass of carbon dioxide and water after the reaction, we can analyze the differences if any, and confirm that no mass was lost during the reaction.

To learn more about science visit:

brainly.com/question/7508826?referrer=searchResults

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The emission spectrum of hydrogen consists of several lines. Which line has the highest frequency?
    11·1 answer
  • Cesium-137 is part of the nuclear waste produced by uranium-235 fission. The half-life of cesium-137 is 30.2 years. How much tim
    11·1 answer
  • What happens to light when it enters a lens?
    11·1 answer
  • What happens to a glass of sugar solution when sugar is added to it?
    5·2 answers
  • CH4+2O2→CO2+2H2O <br> Are those elements or compounds?
    8·1 answer
  • You have a solution of calcium chloride dissolved in water. You add some more solid to the solution and stir, and the solid diss
    6·1 answer
  • Define "Enantiomer" and "Diastereomer"
    5·1 answer
  • How does this data provide evidence for base pairing in dna
    6·1 answer
  • The picture shows two lightbulbs powered by a solar cell. Describe the
    10·1 answer
  • How much energy is required to vaporize 1.5 kg of copper? (Refer to table of
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!