Answer:
The statement "if the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity, the path of the particle is a straight line" is false.
Explanation:
The equation for the magnetic force on a charge q moving at velocity v on a magnetic field B is given by the (vectorial) Lorentz Force Law 
From it we can clearly see that the <em>magnitude of the magnetic force </em>exerted on the particle is <em>proportional to the magnitude of the charge q and to the speed v of the particle</em>, and that it is also <em>perpendicular to the particle's velocity</em>. This means that at each instant it moves perpendicularly to the force, so <em>the work done by the magnetic force on the particle is zero</em>.
The statement "if the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity, the path of the particle is a straight line" is false not only for this but for any force, a force always perpendicular to a velocity will curve the trajectory.
Answer: La diferencia es el peso (o la masa), siendo que el cubo de hierro es el mas pesado, después viene el de madera y después el de icopor.
Explanation:
Ok, los 3 cubos tienen el mismo tamaño, lo que implica que tienen el mismo volumen.
Ahora es útil recordar la relación:
Densidad = masa/volumen.
Masa = densidad*volumen.
Nosotros sabemos que la densidad del hierro es mas grande que la de la madera, y la densidad de la madera es mas grande que la del icopor.
Entonces, por la relación anterior, y sabiendo que todos los cubos tienen el mismo volumen, podemos reconocer que el cubo de hierro tiene mayor masa, después viene el de madera y después viene el de icopor.
Y sabiendo que:
masa*gravedad = peso
podemos saber que el cubo mas pesado es el de hierro, después el de madera y después el de icopor.
Además de esta diferencia, también hay otras que no dependen tanto del tamaño del objeto, como pueden ser las capacidades caloríficas, el como reaccionan a campos eléctricos y cosas así que son triviales, pues son diferentes para casi todos los materiales.
The chocolate softens and melts as it absorbs the microwaves, and it makes a mess.
I hope that the attachment helps you..
Answer:
The time constant is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The spring constant is 
The mass of the ball is 
The amplitude of the oscillation t the beginning is 
The amplitude after time t is 
The number of oscillation is 
Generally the time taken to attain the second amplitude is mathematically represented as
Here T is the period of oscillation
=> 
=> 
Generally the amplitude at time t is mathematically represented as
Here a is the damping constant so
at ,
So
=> 
taking natural log of both sides
=> 
=> 
Generally the time constant is mathematically represented as
=> 
=>
