376,377,378,379,380,381,382,383,384,385,386,387,388,389,390,391,392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400
just kidding its 396.5
hope this helped
Answer: look at the picture
Step-by-step explanation: Hope this help :D
Abc is the answer hope that helps
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Table 1</h3>
- x- values change 1 to 4
- y- values change inconsistently and repeat at -2
This is <u>not</u> a linear function
<h3>Table 2</h3>
- x- values change 1 to 4
- y- values change consistently, with common difference of -2
<u>This is a linear function</u>
<h3>Table 3</h3>
- x- values change 1 to 4
- y- values change inconsistently, the difference is not common
This is <u>not</u> a linear function
<h3>Table 4</h3>
- x- values change 1 to 4
- y- values change inconsistently, the difference is not common
This is <u>not</u> a linear function
Answer:
Let 'x' and 'y' be two different numbers.
Leila says that 75% of a number will always be greater than 50% of a number. The inequality that represents this statement is the following:
0.75x > 0.5y
Let x = 100 and y=200. We have that:
0.75(100) > 0.5(200)
75 > 100 ❌ INCORRECT ❌
Given that we found a case in which 75% of a number is not greater than 50% of a number, we can conclude that Leila's claim is incorrect.
