1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
UkoKoshka [18]
3 years ago
11

A diagram that shows thermal energy being released by an object is called a blank

Physics
1 answer:
timofeeve [1]3 years ago
8 0
Electromagnetic wave “nc”
You might be interested in
Block A has mass 1.00 kg and block B has mass 3.00 kg. The blocks collide and stick together on a level, frictionless surface. A
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

1/2mv²=0

1/2(4kg)(v²)=0

2=-v²

square root -2=v

v=1.414

5 0
3 years ago
Atoms are the smallest portions of an element that retain the original characteristics of the element. True or false
kozerog [31]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Going even smaller than atoms would get you to subatomic particles such as quarks. From there, it is impossible to distinguish elements. So, yes, atoms are the smallest portions of an element that retains the original characteristic of the element.

4 0
4 years ago
The electric force between two charged objects is influenced by
tresset_1 [31]
<span> attraction between the relative abundance of electrons in one object and protons in the other   


</span>
7 0
4 years ago
What is the advantage in solving motion problems using energy conservation principles instead of free body diagrams
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

However, the disadvantages are:

1. Many atimes for some motion prolems, free-body diagrams has to be drawn many times so to have enough equations to solve for the unknowns. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.

2. In situations where we need to find the internal forces acting on an object, we can't truly solve such problems using free-body diagram as it captures external forces. This is not the same with energy conservation principles.

Explanation:

Often times the ideal method to use in solving motion problem related questions are mostly debated.

Energy conservation principles applies to isolated systems are useful when object changes their positions in moving upward or downward converts its potential energy due to gravity for kinetic energy, or the other way round. When energy in a system or motion remains constant that is energy is neither created nor destroyed, it can therefore be easier to calculate other unknown paramters like in the motion problem velocity, distance bearing it in mind that energy can only change from one type to another.

On the other hand, free body diagram which is a visual representation of all the forces acting on an object including their directions has so many advantages in solving motion related problems which include finding relationship between force and motion in identifying the force acting on a body.

5 0
3 years ago
A rocket ship is accelerating at 200 m/s2, its mas is 135,000,000 kg. What is the force generated by this acceleration?
Rina8888 [55]

Acceleration does NOT "generate" force.  Acceleration NEEDS force to make it happen.  Without force ... provided by something else ... acceleration can't happen.

The force NEEDED to accelerate a mass with a certain acceleration is

Force needed = (mass) times (acceleration)

For the rocket ship in the question,

Force = (135,000,000 kg) times (200 m/s²)

Force = (135,000,000 x 200) kg-m/s²

<em>Force = 27 Giga-Newtons  </em>(27,000,000,000 Newtons)


The gas-generator cycle F-1 rocket engine, developed in the US by Rocketdyne in the late 1950s, was used in the Saturn V rocket, the main launch vehicle of NASA's Apollo moon lander program .  Five F-1 engines were used in the first stage of each Saturn V.  

==> The thrust of each F-1 engine at full throttle is 7,770 kilo-Newtons.  

It would take <em>3,475 </em>of these F-1 rocket engines, running full-throttle, to provide the force calculated in the answer to this question.  If you didn't have 3,475 F-1 rocket engines, then you couldn't accelerate 135,000,000 kg at 200 m/s².

(And by the way ... the mass of each F-1 engine is 8,400 kg.  So 3,475 engines alone account for 22% of the mass you're trying to accelerate.  And don't even get me started about the mass of the FUEL you'd need to carry.)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The half-life of plutonium-238 is 87.7 years. What percentage of the atoms in a sample of plutonium-238 will remain radioactive
    15·2 answers
  • A hot air balloon is traveling vertically upward at a constant speed of 4.5 m/s. When it is 28 m above the ground, a package is
    8·1 answer
  • Scientists have changed the model of the atom as they have gathered new evidence. One of the atomic models is shown below.
    7·1 answer
  • What does Archimedes' principle say about how the buoyant force relates to the fluid involved?
    11·1 answer
  • A large box has a mass of 500kg and the coefficient of static friction for the box and the floor is 0.45, and the coefficient of
    7·1 answer
  • Which animals are cold-blooded, obtain dissolved oxygen in water through gills, have scales, have fins, and live in water
    11·1 answer
  • Three 20.0 ohm resistors are
    9·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from Through the Looking-Glass by Lewis Carroll.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the acceleration of a sinking rock if it has a mass of 0.25 kg and has a net force of 0.44 N acting on it?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered a "point source" of water
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!