Answer:
Amount borrow P = $15,026.296
Explanation:
Given:
Amount pay A = $20,000
Number of year n = 3
Rate r = 10% = 0.10
Find:
Amount borrow P
Computation:
A = P[1+r]ⁿ
20,000 = P[1+r]³
20,000 = P[1+0.10]³
20,000 = P[1.10]³
20,000 = P[1.331]
Amount borrow P = $15,026.296
Answer:
2.3%
Explanation:
The computation of the actual real rate of return is shown below:-
Actual real rate of return on this bond for last year = ((1 + Nominal rate of interest ) ÷ (1 + Inflation rate of return)) - 1
= ((1 + 0.0601) ÷ (1 + 0.03)) - 1
= 1.0601 ÷ 1.03 - 1
= 1.023 - 1
= 0.023
or
= 2.3%
Therefore for computing the actual rate of return we simply applied the above formula.
The national government frequently uses specific types of grants to obliquely encourage corporate development. An official cash award provided by a federal, state, or municipal government body for a worthwhile enterprise is known as a government grant. It functions as a transfer payment in essence.
Technical help and other forms of financial support, such as loans, loan guarantees, and interest rate subsidies, are not included in grants. The most prevalent types include grants for small businesses, science-related grants, awards for nonprofit organisations, and grants for education.
Each person or organisation must fulfil conditions established by the government in order to be eligible to receive grant monies. Government funding for grants is authorised and appropriated.
To know more about national government, click here:-
brainly.com/question/28826393
#SPJ4
I think the taxes would decrease but increase for the company
Answer:
violates ethical, but not legal, standards.
Explanation:
Sherman act was created to prohibit restrains on trade of any collusion by different parties to form a monopoly or control price.
The act does not however prohibit all restraints of trade, bit rather those that are very unreasonable and harmful to competition.
In the given scenario the three companies only agreed to bid lowest for the 3 project under consideration.
Their action does not give them unfair advantage over other firms and may even lead to a loss on their part.
They do not have a strategy that will guarantee an edge over other firms.
So this is an ethical violation but not a legal one.
