Answer:
A
Explanation:
Would you base your career options using science?
Would you base your moral behavior on science? Science is notorious for not being able to answer moral questions.
Would you base the "meaning of life" on science? The meaning of life is hardly a question that the periodic table could answer.
The only option left is plant growth which science could answer.
<u>Given: </u>
Radius of culvert, r = 0.5 m
Tangential acceleration of the truck, a = 3 m/s2
<u>To determine:</u>
The angular acceleration, α
<u>Explanation:</u>
The tangential acceleration is related to the angular acceleration through the radius as:
a = rα
α = a/r = 3 ms⁻²/0.5 m = 6 s⁻²
Ans: The angular acceleration is 6 s⁻²
Solving this chemistry is a little bit hard because the question didn't give some important detailed.
So first, there are a couple problems with your question.
We will just need to know which direction will it proceed to reach equilibrium.
Your expression for Kc (and Qc ) for the reaction should be:
Kc = [C] / [A] [B]^2
You have not provided a value for Kc, so a value of Qc tells you absolutely nothing. Qc is only valuable in relation to a numerical value for Kc. If Qc = Kc, then the reaction is at equilibrium. If Q < K, the reaction will form more products to reach equilibrium, and if Q > Kc, the reaction will form more reactants.
Cant really explain, for say, but its D.-ide
gfd
gd
fg
fg
g
ds
gf
df
gd
g
