Answer:
56.25 pound of the coffee that costs $5 per pound is needed
18.75 pound of the coffee that costs $9 per pound is needed
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of pounds be x and y respectively
The total pounds is 75;
So;
x + y. = 75 •••••••(i)
Total cost of first type
9 * x = $9x
Total cost of second type;
5 * y= $5y
75 pound at $6 per pound; total cost of this is;
6 * 75 = $450
Thus;
9x + 5y = 450 ••••••••(ii)
From i, x = 75-y
Put this into ii
9(75-y) + 5y = 450
675 -9y + 5y = 450
4y = 675-450
4y = 225
y = 225/4
y = 56.25
x = 75 - y from i
x = 75-56.25
x = $18.75
Carl is incorrect. Dave ate a higher fraction of snack bars, by 0.2 snack bars.
Carl had .5 left of a snack bar.
Dave had .3 left of a snack bar.
Tony had .5 left of a snack bar.
Gary had .0 left of a snack bar.
Tryone had .7 left of a snack bar.
If we add the above snack bars, there is a total of two remaining snack bars, meaning they only ate 12 of 14 snack bars.
Answer:
The last table given See attached image)
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that they are asking for the inverse function to the one with the detailed relationship given. The original relationship was assigning to the Domain of number of people attending, the Range of values for charges.
Therefore, the inverse function will be assigning in the opposite way: from the average charges (now the Domain of this relationship), to the number of people attending (now the Range of this relationship). The relationship should also maintain the original element to element connection:
What was:
(20, $10) should now be ($10, 20)
(26, $6.25) should now be ($6.25, 26)
(35, $4) should now be ($4, 35)
This is exactly represented by the last table (see also image attached)
Answer:
the answer is 13, because you need to divide 91 by 7.