31 protons 31 electrons and 39 nutrons
Answer:- Oxidation number of Cl does not change as it is -1 on both sides.
Explanations:- oxidation number of Mg on reactant side is 0 as it is in its elemental form(not combined with another element).
Oxidation number of hydrogen in its compounds is +1, so if H is +1 in HCl the oxidation number of Cl is -1 as the sum has to be zero.
On product side, Mg oxidation number is +2 as the oxidation number of alkaline earth metals in their compounds is +2.
Two Cl are present in magnesium chloride, so if Mg is +2 then Cl is -1.
Oxidation number of H on product side is 0 as it is present in its elemental for,
,
So, it is only chlorine(Cl) whose oxidation number does not change for the given equation.
Option 3 using forest land to build homes
<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
The empirical formula is the option B. ![NH_{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=NH_%7B3%7D)
<h2>
Why?</h2>
The empirical formula of a compound is the simplest formula that can be written. On the opposite, the molecular formula involves a variant of the same compound, but it can be also simplified to an empirical formula.
![MolecularFormula=n(EmpiricalFormula)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MolecularFormula%3Dn%28EmpiricalFormula%29)
We are looking for a formula that cannot be simplified by dividing the number of molecules/atoms that conforms the compound.
Let's discard option by option in order to find which formula is an empirical formula (cannot be simplified)
A. ![N_{2}O_{4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=N_%7B2%7DO_%7B4%7D)
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.
![N_{2}O_{4}=2(NO_{2})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=N_%7B2%7DO_%7B4%7D%3D2%28NO_%7B2%7D%29)
B. ![NH_{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=NH_%7B3%7D)
It's an empirical formula since it cannot be obtained by the multiplication of a whole number and the simplest formula. It's the simplest formula that we can find of the compound.
C. ![C_{3}H_{6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C_%7B3%7DH_%7B6%7D)
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.
![C_{3}H_{6}=3(CH_{2})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C_%7B3%7DH_%7B6%7D%3D3%28CH_%7B2%7D%29)
D. ![P_{4}O_{10}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7B4%7DO_%7B10%7D)
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.
![P_{4}O_{10}=2(P_{2}O_{5})](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P_%7B4%7DO_%7B10%7D%3D2%28P_%7B2%7DO_%7B5%7D%29)
Hence, the empirical formula is the option B. ![NH_{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=NH_%7B3%7D)
Have a nice day!
Answer:
A structure made up of two or more types of tissue is an organ
Explanation:
Hope this helps