1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naya [18.7K]
4 years ago
12

Particle A of charge 2.70 10-4 C is at the origin, particle B of charge -6.36 10-4 C is at (4.00 m, 0), and particle C of charge

1.04 10-4 C is at (0, 3.00 m). We wish to find the net electric force on C.

Physics
1 answer:
Serhud [2]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

FC vector representation

F_{C} =(19.03i+13.78j)N

Magnitude of FC

F_{C}=23.495N

Vector direction FC

\beta=35.91 degrees: angle that forms FC with the horizontal

Explanation:

Conceptual analysis

Because the particle C is close to two other electrically charged particles, it will experience two electrical forces and the solution of the problem is of a vector nature.

The directions of the individual forces exerted by qA and qB on qC are shown in the attached figure; The force (FAC) of qA over qC is repulsive because they have equal signs and the force (FBC) of qB over qC is attractive because they have opposite signs.

The FAC force is up in the positive direction and the FBC force forms an α angle with respect to the x axis.

\alpha = tan^{-1}(\frac{3}{4}) = 36.86 degrees

To calculate the magnitudes of the forces we apply Coulomb's law:

F_{AC} = \frac{k*q_{A}*q_{C}}{r_{AC}^2} Equation (1): Magnitude of the electric force of the charge qA over the charge qC

F_{BC} = \frac{k*q_{B}*q_{C}}{r_{BC}^2} Equation (2) : Magnitude of the electric force of the charge qB over the charge qC

Known data

k=8.99*10^9 \frac{N*m^2}{C^2}

q_{A}=2.70*10^{-4} C

q_{B}=-6.36*10^{-4} C

q_{C}=1.04*10^{-4} C

r_{AC} =3

r_{BC}=\sqrt{4^2+3^2} = 5

Problem development

In the equations (1) and (2) to calculate FAC Y FBC:

F_{AC} =8.99*10^9*(2.70*10^{-4}* 1.04*10^{-4})/(3)^2=28.05N

F_{BC} =8.99*10^9*(6.36*10^{-4}* 1.04*10^{-4})/(5)^2=23.785N

Components of the FBC force at x and y:

F_{BCx}=23.785 *Cos(36.86)=19.03N

F_{BCy}=23.785 *Sin(36.86)=14.27N

Components of the resulting force acting on qC:

F_{Cx} = F_{ACx}+ F_{BCx}=0+19.03=19.03N

F_{Cy} = F_{ACy}+ F_{BCy}=28.05-14.27=13.78N

FC vector representation

F_{C} =(19.03i+13.78j)N

Magnitude of FC

F_{C}= \sqrt{19.03^2+13.78^2} =23.495N

Vector direction FC

\beta = tan^{-1} (\frac{13.78}{19.03})=35.91 degrees: angle that forms FC with the horizontal

You might be interested in
If the velocity of blood flow in the aorta is normally about 0.32 m/s, what beat frequency would you expect if 4.40-MHz ultrasou
dusya [7]

Answer:

The beat frequency is 0.0019 MHz.

Explanation:

Given that,

Velocity = 0.32 m/s

Frequency = 4.40 MHz

Speed of wave = 1540 m/s

We need to calculate the frequency

Case (I),

Observer is moving away from the source

Using Doppler's effect

f'=\dfrac{v-v'}{v}f

Where, v' = speed of observer

Put the value into the formula

f'=\dfrac{1540-0.32}{1540}\times4.40

f'=4.399\ MHz

Case (II),

Cell is as the source of sound of frequency f' and it moving away from the observer.

Using formula of frequency

f''=\dfrac{v-v_{s}}{v+v_{s}}\times f

f''=\dfrac{1540-0.32}{1540+0.32}\times4.399

f''=4.3971\ MHz

We need to calculate the beat frequency

\Delta f= f'-f''

\Delta f=4.399-4.3971=0.0019\ MHz

Hence, The beat frequency is 0.0019 MHz.

4 0
3 years ago
Plz help me I will mark brainlieat Ques. Write down name and molecular formula of a
Rzqust [24]
The compound is (Sulphuric Acid) H2SO4. On reacting with (Sodium Hydroxide) NaOH, it gives (2 Water Molecules/Colored) 2H2O and (1 Sodium Sulfate Molecule/Salt) Na2SO4

H2SO4 + NaOH —> 2H2O (aq.) + Na2SO4 (salt)

The resulted salt/compound (Na2SO4) when reacting with Methyl Orange (MO) is called ”Removal of methyl orange dye and Na2SO4 salt from synthetic wastewater using reverse osmosis (RO)”

The efficiency of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes used for treatment of colored water effluents can be affected by the presence of both salt and dyes.

Concentration polarization of each of the dye and the salt and the possibility of a dynamic membrane formed by the concentrated dye can affect the performance of the RO membrane.

The objective of the current work was to study the effect of varying the Na2SO4 salt and methyl orange (MO) dye concentrations on the performance of a spiral wound polyamide membrane.

The work also involved the development of a theoretical model based on the solution diffusion (SD) mass transport theory that takes into consideration a pressure dependent dynamic membrane resistance as well as both salt and dye concentration polarizations.

Control tests were performed using distilled water, dye/water and salt/water feeds to determine the parameters for the model.

The experimental results showed that increasing the dye concentration from 500 to 1000 ppm resulted in a decrease in the salt rejection at all of the operating pressures and for both feed salt concentrations of 5000 and 10,000 ppm.

Increasing the salt concentration from 5000 to 10,000 ppm resulted in a slight decrease in the percent dye removal. The model’s results agreed well with these general trends.

7 0
4 years ago
A projectile of mass m is launched with an initial velocity vector v i making an angle θ with the horizontal as shown below. The
sergeinik [125]
Angular momentum is given by the length of the arm to the object, multiplied by the momentum of the object, times the cosine of the angle that the momentum vector makes with the arm. From your illustration, that will be: 
<span>L = R * m * vi * cos(90 - theta) </span>

<span>cos(90 - theta) is just sin(theta) </span>
<span>and R is the distance the projectile traveled, which is vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>so, we have: L = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) * m * vi * sin(theta) / g </span>

<span>We can combine the two vi terms and get: </span>

<span>L = vi^3 * m * sin(theta) * sin(2*theta) / g </span>

<span>What's interesting is that angular momentum varies with the *cube* of the initial velocity. This is because, not only does increased velocity increase the translational momentum of the projectile, but it increase the *moment arm*, too. Also note that there might be a trig identity which lets you combine the two sin() terms, but nothing jumps out at me right at the moment. </span>

<span>Now, for the first part... </span>

<span>There are a few ways to attack this. Basically, you have to find the angle from the origin to the apogee (highest point) in the arc. Once we have that, we'll know what angle the momentum vector makes with the moment-arm because, at the apogee, we know that all of the motion is *horizontal*. </span>

<span>Okay, so let's get back to what we know: </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>where d is the distance (length to the arm), m is mass, v is velocity, and phi is the angle the velocity vector makes with the arm. Let's take these one by one... </span>

<span>m is still m. </span>
<span>v is going to be the *hoizontal* component of the initial velocity (all the vertical component got eliminated by the acceleration of gravity). So, v = vi * cos(theta) </span>
<span>d is going to be half of our distance R in part two (because, ignoring friction, the path of the projectile is a perfect parabola). So, d = vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g </span>

<span>That leaves us with phi, the angle the horizontal velocity vector makes with the moment arm. To find *that*, we need to know what the angle from the origin to the apogee is. We can find *that* by taking the arc-tangent of the slope, if we know that. Well, we know the "run" part of the slope (it's our "d" term), but not the rise. </span>

<span>The easy way to get the rise is by using conservation of energy. At the apogee, all of the *vertical* kinetic energy at the time of launch (1/2 * m * (vi * sin(theta))^2 ) has been turned into gravitational potential energy ( m * g * h ). Setting these equal, diving out the "m" and dividing "g" to the other side, we get: </span>

<span>h = 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g </span>

<span>So, there's the rise. So, our *slope* is rise/run, so </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * (vi * sin(theta))^2 / g ] / [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / g ] </span>

<span>The "g"s cancel. Astoundingly the "vi"s cancel, too. So, we get: </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ sin(2*theta) ] </span>

<span>(It's not too alarming that slope-at-apogee doesn't depend upon vi, since that only determines the "magnitude" of the arc, but not it's shape. Whether the overall flight of this thing is an inch or a mile, the arc "looks" the same). </span>

<span>Okay, so... using our double-angle trig identities, we know that sin(2*theta) = 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta), so... </span>

<span>slope = [ 1/2 * sin(theta)^2 ] / [ 2*sin(theta)*cos(theta) ] = tan(theta)/4 </span>

<span>Okay, so the *angle* (which I'll call "alpha") that this slope makes with the x-axis is just: arctan(slope), so... </span>

<span>alpha = arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Alright... last bit. We need "phi", the angle the (now-horizontal) momentum vector makes with that slope. Draw it on paper and you'll see that phi = 180 - alpha </span>

<span>so, phi = 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) </span>

<span>Now, we go back to our original formula and plug it ALL in... </span>

<span>L = d * m * v * cos(phi) </span>

<span>becomes... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( 180 - arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>

<span>Now, cos(180 - something) = cos(something), so we can simplify a little bit... </span>

<span>L = [ vi^2 * sin(2*theta) / 2g ] * m * [ vi * cos(theta) ] * [ cos( arctan( tan(theta) / 4 ) ) ] </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A Carnot heat engine has an efficiency of 0.400. If it operates between a deep lake with a constant temperature of 298.0k and a
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

496.7 K

Explanation:

The efficiency of a Carnot engine is given by the equation:

\eta = 1 - \frac{T_H}{T_L}

where:

T_H is the temperature of the hot reservoir

T_C is the temperature of the cold reservoir

For the engine in the problem, we know that

\eta = 0.400 is the efficiency

T_C = 298.0 K is the temperature of the cold reservoir

Solving for T_H, we find:

\frac{T_C}{T_H}=1-\eta\\T_H = \frac{T_C}{1-\eta} =\frac{298.0}{1-0.400}=496.7 K

6 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST! PLS ANSWER ASAP
Montano1993 [528]

Answer

What makes up a perfect planet? It is the right distance from the Sun, it is protected from harmful solar radiation by its magnetic field, it is kept warm by an insulating atmosphere, and it has the right chemical ingredients for life, including water and carbon. Proportionate Ozone Layer and Light amount. According to the panspermia hypothesis, microscopic life—distributed by meteoroids, asteroids and other small Solar System bodies—may exist throughout the Universe. This is the perfect planet. In the end a perfect planet includes SUSTAINBLE DEVELOPEMNT IN EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A car owner forgets to turn off the headlights of his car while it is parked in his garage. If the 12.0-V battery in his car is
    10·2 answers
  • Explain how kinetic energy transforms into potential energy. Give at least 2 examples.
    7·1 answer
  • Cat blames herself for her recent job loss. Her therapist suggests that she is depressed because she blames herself rather than
    6·1 answer
  • You are driving your car at a speed of 60 miles per hour, when you cross into Canada. Canada measures their speed in kilometers
    6·1 answer
  • An information signal consists of a 25 Hz and a 75 Hz sine waves summed together. It is sampled at a frequency of 500 Hz, the hi
    11·1 answer
  • The students look through the side of the aquarium.
    12·1 answer
  • The color green and blue are visual preference for newborns<br> A. True<br> B. False
    11·1 answer
  • A pathogen has entered your body and you become sick. You develop a fever and vomit. This is your body's way of trying to mainta
    11·1 answer
  • Aluminium is metal or metalloid
    13·2 answers
  • The key differences between rotational kinematics and translational kinematics is: A. Rotational kinematics must specify an axis
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!