All categories

3 years ago

What is the are of the sqare? (P=4s) (A=s2) the bottom of the sqare has a perimeter of 3ft

Mathematics

1 answer:

Anettt [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

You plug in 3 as s. So ur formula is P=4(3)

P=12 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

yes im answering this from a year later i just need like 3 points sry

You might be interested in

(02.03)Figure ABC is reflected about the x-axis to obtain figure A'B'C':

faust18 [17]

Answer:

B.(–2, –7)

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

4 years ago

Two ways to solve 2(4x-11)=10

Leokris [45]

Hi there,

2 (4x - 11) = 10
4x - 11 = 5
4x = 5 + 11
4x = 16 then divide both sides by 4
16 divided by 4 = 4

Hope this helps :)

3 0

3 years ago

Find 250% of 60 please help thanks

____ [38]

Answer:

the answer is 150!

Step-by-step explanation:

250% of 60=150

4 0

3 years ago

A researcher claims that the variation in the salaries of elementary school teachers is greater than the variation in the salari

guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2 _2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \sigma_1 ^2 > \sigma^2_2$

$F_{critical} = 1.8608$

$F = 2.9085$

The decision rule is

Reject the null hypothesis

There is sufficient evidence to support the researchers claim

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 30$

The sample variance for elementary school is $s^2_1 = 8324$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 30$

The sample variance for the secondary school is $s^2_2 = 2862$

The significance level is $\alpha = 0.05$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : \sigma^2_1 = \sigma^2 _2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : \sigma_1 ^2 > \sigma^2_2$

Generally from the F statistics table the critical value of $\alpha = 0.05$ at first and second degree of freedom $df_1 = n_1 - 1 = 30 - 1 = 29$ and $df_2 = n_2 - 1 = 30 - 1 = 29$ is

$F_{critical} = 1.8608$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$F = \frac{s_1^2 }{s_2^2}$

=> $F = \frac{8324 }{2862}$

=> $F = 2.9085$

Generally from the value obtained we see that $F > F_{critical }$ Hence

The decision rule is

Reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to support the researchers claim

4 0

3 years ago

I'm stuck on this. Please help!!

Sveta_85 [38]

I think it is F, but I am a not sure.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers