Using multiplication signal rules, it is found that:
A: Emma's statement is always false.
B: The result is always negative.
C: Emma's statement is always true.
The rule used for this exercise is as follows:
- When two numbers of different signals are multiplied, the result is negative.
- When two numbers have the same signal, the result is positive.
Part A:
- Three numbers are multiplied, all negative.
- The multiplication of the first two result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by a negative number, and the result will be negative, which mean that Emma's statement is always false.
Two examples are:


Part B:
The rule is that the result is always negative.
Part C:
- The multiplication of the first two negative numbers result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by another positive number, and the result will be positive, which mean that Emma's statement is always true.
Two examples are:


A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24764960
Use this 3 following steps:
1)At first, we should find the roots :
3x+8=0 => x=-8/3
x-4=0 => x=4
2)Using a chart for the limits:
photo
3)choose your solution:
[-8/3,-4)==> Sentence 3 is correct
so basically what i was thinking of was they sold them in the spring
Answer:
The call premium is $35
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, the call premium is found as follows.


So, the call premium is $35.
Best of luck.
Answer:
The value of the experimental probability is greater
Step-by-step explanation:
For the theoretical probability;
the probability that a card with the number 3 is selected is 1/5
We consider that the probabilities of each selection are equal, for the theoretical probability
For the experimental, we simply place the frequency of the selection 3 over the total
that will be 128/400 = 8/25
As we know that 8/25 is greater than 1/5
We can conclude that the value of the experimental probability is greater than that of the theoretical