Answer:
No
Explanation:
tratar de justificar nuestras propias decisiones es algo totalmente innecesario, ya que todos tenemos derecho a tomar decisiones que en ocasiones pueden afectar indirectamente a otras personas y no hay nada de malo en ello.
Por otro lado, si está tomando una acción o tomando una decisión únicamente con la intención de afectar a otras personas, su acción no tiene justificación alguna.
False i just took the test and put true as a guess but got it wrong so it is false
please give me a brainlies
Answer:
V = - 0.5 [m/s]
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem, we must use the principle of relative speeds. This is for an observer who is on the edge of the river he can see how the river moves to the left and the woman tries to move to the right but can not since:
![V_{total}=-3+2.5\\V_{total}=-0.5 [m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V_%7Btotal%7D%3D-3%2B2.5%5C%5CV_%7Btotal%7D%3D-0.5%20%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
That is, the person sees how the woman moves to the left but with avelocity of 0.5 [m/s] to the left
Answer:
25.71 kgm/s
Explanation:
Let K₁ and K₂ be the initial and final kinetic energies of object A and v₁ and v₂ its initial and final speeds.
Given that K₂ = 0.7K₁
1/2mv₂² = 0.7(1/2mv₁²)
v₂ = √0.7v₁ = √0.7 × 20 m/s = ±16.73 m/s
Since A rebounds, its velocity = -16.73 m/s and its momentum change, p₂ = mΔv = m(v₂ - v₁) = 0.7 kg (-16.73 - 20) m/s = 0.7( -36.73) = -25.71 kgm/s.
Th magnitude of object A's momentum change is thus 25.71 kgm/s