Because the specific metals aren’t mentioned in this inquiry.
The educational guesses that we can propose is that:
<span><span>1. </span>The
hypothetical inquiry: There are existing metals for making pots that will cook
food much faster.</span>
<span><span>2. </span>The
one-tailed alternative hypothesis: There are other metals for making pots that
will cook food much faster than the other metals.</span>
<span><span>
3. </span>The
one-tailed null hypothesis: All metals that are used in making pots will cook
food at an equal rate.</span>
Answer:
No, it is not conserved
Explanation:
Let's calculate the total kinetic energy before the collision and compare it with the total kinetic energy after the collision.
The total kinetic energy before the collision is:

where m1 = m2 = 1 kg are the masses of the two carts, v1=2 m/s is the speed of the first cart, and where v2=0 is the speed of the second cart, which is zero because it is stationary.
After the collision, the two carts stick together with same speed v=1 m/s; their total kinetic energy is

So, we see that the kinetic energy was not conserved, because the initial kinetic energy was 2 J while the final kinetic energy is 1 J. This means that this is an inelastic collision, in which only the total momentum is conserved. This loss of kinetic energy does not violate the law of conservation of energy: in fact, the energy lost has simply been converted into another form of energy, such as heat, during the collision.
Answer:
9758 how many significant figures
Answer: 
Explanation:
The confidence interval for population mean is given by :-

Given : Sample size : 
Sample mean : 
Standard deviation : 
Significance level : 
Critical value : 
Now, the 95% confidence interval estimate of the (true, unknown) mean sound intensity of all food processors of this type :-
