7.5 M is the concentration of 60 ml of H3PO4 if it is neutralized by 225 ml of 2 M Ba(OH)2.
Explanation:
Data given:
volume of phosphoric acid, Vacid =60 ml
volume of barium hydroxide, Vbase = 225 ml
molarity of barium hydroxide, Mbase = 2M
Molarity of phosphoric acid, Macid =?
the formula for titration is used as:
Macid x Vacid = Mbase x Vbase
rearranging the equation to get Macid
Macid = 
Macid =
Macid = 7.5 M
the concentration of the phosphoric acid is 7.5 M and the volume is 60 ml. Thus 7.5 M solution of phosphoric acid is used to neutralize the barium hydroxide solution of 2M.
Answer is: at higher temperatures reaction will go to the right (forward), more products (C₂H₄ and H₂) will be produce, because this is endothermic reaction (ΔH<span> is positive, </span>energy is consumed) and according Le Chatelier's principle <span>heat is included as a reactant. </span> .
when carbon dioxide gas is collected down ward of water wet gas is collected by the downward displacement of water . This is used for gases that are not very soluble in water . ... In water , carbon dioxide produces a weakly acidic solution , carbonic acid .
Answer:
See figure 1
Explanation:
If we want to find the acid and the Brønsted-Lowry base, we must remember the definition for each of these molecules:
-) Acid: hydrogen donor
-) Base: hydrogen acceptor
In the <u>caffeine structure,</u> we have several atoms of nitrogen. These nitrogen atoms have the ability to <u>accept</u> hydronium ions (
). Therefore the caffeine molecule will be the base since it can accept
If caffeine is the base, the water must be the acid. So, the water in this reaction donated a hydronium ion.
<u>Thus, caffeine is the base and water the acid. (See figure 1)</u>
Answer: Rod X.
Explanation:
Ok, the electricity starts in the top left part. First, it must travel in the X rod, then it keeps traveling until it reaches the parallel path, and it can go to the Z rod, to the Y rod, or to both of them, and then it reaches the bulb (the circle with a X inside of it).
We know that two rods are conductors of electricity.
Now, suppose the case where rods Z and Y are the ones that conduct electricity, this means that X does not conduct electricity, then when the current reaches to X it stops (because X does not conduct) then the electricity never reaches the rods Z and Y, and then the electricity never reaches the bulb, but we know that the bulb lights up, so we must have that X is one of the conducting rods.
Then, if for example, Y does not conduct electricity, the electricity still can run through the Z rod and eventually reach the bulb.
So we can conclude that the rod that is definitely a conductor of electricity is rod X
