Answer: The present value of the new drug is $19.33 million
We follow these steps to arrive at the answer:
Expected Revenues from the drug in year 1(P) $2 million
Growth Rate (g) 2% p.a.
No. of years (n) 17 years
Discount rate (r) 9% p.a.
Since the revenues are expected to grow at a constant rate of 2% p.a, we can treat this series of cash flows as a <u>growing annuity. </u>
We calculate the Present Value of a growing annuity with the following formula:
![PV = \frac{P}{r-g}*\left [ 1- \left (\frac{1+g}{1+r}\right)^{n}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BP%7D%7Br-g%7D%2A%5Cleft%20%5B%201-%20%5Cleft%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%2Bg%7D%7B1%2Br%7D%5Cright%29%5E%7Bn%7D%5Cright%5D)
Substituting the values we get,
![PV = \frac{2}{0.09-0.02}*\left [ 1- \left (\frac{1+0.02}{1+0.09}\right)^{17}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B0.09-0.02%7D%2A%5Cleft%20%5B%201-%20%5Cleft%20%28%5Cfrac%7B1%2B0.02%7D%7B1%2B0.09%7D%5Cright%29%5E%7B17%7D%5Cright%5D)
![PV = \frac{2}{0.07}*\left [1- 0.323558233\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=PV%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B0.07%7D%2A%5Cleft%20%5B1-%200.323558233%5Cright%5D)
Answer:
the net book value of the asset halfway through its useful life will be less than if straight-line depreciation is used.
Explanation:
Let me use an example to illustrate this.
An asset has a useful life of 4 years. It costs $1000. It has a salvage value of 0
If the straight line depreciation method is used , the depreciation expense every year = $1000/ 4 = $250
The net book value halfway through its useful life = $1000 - ($250 x 2) = $500
If double declining method is used, the depreciation expense in the first year would be = 2/4 x $1000 = $500
The net book value at the beginning of year 2 = $1000 - $500 = $500
Depreciation expense in year 2 = 2/4 x $500 = $250
The net book value at the beginning of year 3 = $500 - $250 = $250
We can see that the net book value halfway through the useful is lower when double declining depreciation method is used
Answer:
Explanation:
There is a correlation between inflation and house prices. ... When interest rates are low, buying homes can be more affordable and increase the demand for homes. If the supply of homes remains constant and the demand increases, then the prices of homes will increase.
Answer:
The proportion of the investment is 100%.
Explanation:
This can be calculated using the following formula:
Rportfolio = (y * Rrisky) + ((1 - y) * Ttbill) ..................... (1)
Where;
Rportfolio = Overall portfolio expected rate of return = 15%. or 0.15
Rrisky = risky portfolio expected rate of return = 15%, or 0.15
Ttbill = T-bill rate = 10%, or 0.10
Substituting the values into equation (1) and solve for y, we have:
0.15 = (y * 0.15) + ((1 - y) * 0.10)
0.15 = 0.15y + 0.10(1 - y)
0.15 = 0.15y + 0.10 - 0.10y
0.15 - 0.10 = 0.15y - 0.10y
0.05 = 0.05y
y = 0.05 / 0.05
y = 1.00, or 100%
Therefore, the proportion of the investment is 100%.
