All categories

3 years ago

13. An aircraft heads North at 320 km/h rel:

Physics

1 answer:

AURORKA [14]3 years ago

7 0

The velocity of the aircraft relative to the ground is 240 km/h North

Explanation:

We can solve this problem by using vector addition. In fact, the velocity of the aircraft relative to the ground is the (vector) sum between the velocity of the aircraft relative to the air and the velocity of the air relative to the ground.

Mathematically:

$v' = v + v_a$

where

v' is the velocity of the aircraft relative to the ground

v is the velocity of the aircraft relative to the air

$v_a$ is the velocity of the air relative to the ground.

Taking north as positive direction, we have:

v = +320 km/h

$v_a = -80 km/h$ (since the air is moving from North)

Therefore, we find

$v'=+320 + (-80) = +240 km/h$ (north)

Learn more about vector addition:

brainly.com/question/4945130

brainly.com/question/5892298

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in

In an interference pattern, the intensity is Group of answer choices smaller in regions of constructive interference than in reg

Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

The same in both the regions of constructive interference and the regions of destructive interference.

Explanation:

Interference is a phenomenon which occurs when two waves meet while moving along the same medium . The amplitude formed as a result of the interference could be greater, lower, or the same amplitude.

Constructive and destructive interference result from the interaction of waves that are correlated or coherent with each other. This is because arose from the same source or they have the same or nearly the same frequency.

The waves being coherent, arising from the same source and having the same frequency explains why it’s the same in both the regions of constructive interference and the regions of destructive interference.

4 0

3 years ago

HELP PLEASE!! An illustration of a pendulum at 3 positions of a pendulum. The equilibrium position is labeled B. The other two p

Sedbober [7]

Answer:

Both A and C

Explanation:

I just got it correct on Edg

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

the net external force on the 24-kg mower is stated to be 51 N. If the force of friction opposing the motion is 24 N, what force

-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

PART A)

External force will be 75 N

PART B)

distance moved will be 1.125 m

Explanation:

PART A)

Given that net force on the mower is

$F_{net} = 51 N$

now we also know that friction force due to ground is given as

$F_f = 24 N$

now we have

$F_{net} = F_{ext} - F_f$

$51 = F_{ext} - 24$

$F_{ext} = 75 N$

so external force will be 75 N

PART B)

deceleration due to friction when external force is removed from it

$a = \frac{F_f}{m}$

$a = \frac{24}{24} = 1 m/s^2$

now we can find the distance by kinematics

$v_f^2 - v_i^2 = 2 a d$

$0 - 1.5^2 = 2(-1)d$

$d = 1.125 m$

so the distance moved will be 1.125 m

6 0

3 years ago

How can a 1kg ball have more kinetic energy than a 100kg ball? Explain both using words and by providing a numerical example

MariettaO [177]

1 kg ball can have more kinetic energy than a 100 kg ball as increase in velocity is having greater impact on K.E than increase in mass.

<u>Explanation</u>:

We know kinetic energy can be judged or calculated by two parameters only which is mass and velocity. As kinetic energy is directly proportional to the $(velocity)^2$ and increase in velocity leads to greater effect on translational Kinetic Energy. Here formula of Kinetic Energy suggests that doubling the mass will double its K.E but doubling velocity will quadruple its velocity:

$\text { Kinetic Energy }=\frac{1}{2} m v^{2}$

Better understood from numerical example as given:

If a man A having weight 50 kg run with speed 5 m/s and another man B having 100 kg weight run with 2.5 m / s. Which man will have more K.E?

This can be solved as follows:

$\text { Kinetic Energy of } \mathrm{A}=\frac{1}{2} 50 \times 5^{2}=625 \mathrm{J}$

$\text { Kinetic Energy bf } \mathrm{B}=\frac{1}{2} 100 \times 2.5^{2}=312.5 \mathrm{J}$

It shows that man A will have more K.E.

Hence 1 kg ball can have more K.E than 100 kg ball by doubling velocity.

4 0

2 years ago

Applying newton's version of kepler's third law (or the orbital velocity law) to the a star orbiting 40,000 light-years from the

Ugo [173]

Applying Newtons version of Kepler's third law or the orbital velocity law to the star orbiting 40000 light years from the center of the Milky Way Galaxy allows us to determine the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy that lies within 40000 light years in the galactic center.

<h3></h3><h3>What is orbital velocity law?</h3>

The orbital velocity law states that, the orbital velocity is directly proportional to the mass of the body for which it is being calculated and inversely proportional to the radius of the body. Earths orbital velocity near its surface is around 8km/sec if the air resistance is disregarded.

In space exploration, orbital velocity is a crucial topic. Space authorities heavily rely on it to comprehend how to launch satellites. It aids scientists in figuring out the velocities at which satellites must orbit a planet or other celestial body to prevent collapsing into it. The speed at which one body orbits the other body is known as the orbital velocity. The term "orbit" refers to an object's consistent circular motion around the Earth. The distance between the object and the earth's centre determines the orbit's velocity.

To know more about orbital velocity law, refer brainly.com/question/11353717

#SPJ4

5 0

1 year ago