Answer:
In atomic physics, the Bohr model or Rutherford–Bohr model, presented by Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford in 1913, is a system consisting of a small, dense nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons—similar to the structure of the Solar System, but with attraction provided by electrostatic forces in place of gravity.
The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Electrolytes are those which dissociates in solution and produces ions.
Ions can carry current,so Electrolytes conduct electiricity.
And non electrolytes are those which do not dissociate in solution and doesnt produce ions.
Since non electrolytes do not produce ions they cannot conduct electricity.
<u>Hence the right option is:</u>
B) Non-electrolytes dissolve and do not dissociate in water providing no charged ions to conduct electricity.
