C is the most reasonable answer!
Answer:
The answer to this is the concentration of glucose (C6H12O6) in mg/dL = 95.48 mg/dL
Explanation:
To solve this we list out the known variables thus
Measured concentration of glucose (C6H12O6) = 5.3mM per liter
The molar mass of glucose = 180.156 g/mol
From the above, it is seen that one mole of glucose contains 180.156 grams of C6H12O6 therefore 5.3 mM which is 5.3 × 10⁻³ moles contains
5.3 × 10⁻³ moles × 180.156 g/mol = 0.9548 grams of glucose
Also 1 d L = 0.1 L or 1 L = 10 dL and 1 mg = 1000 g, hence
thus 0.9548 grams per liter is equivalent to 1000/10 × 0.9548 milligrams per dL or 95.48 mg/dL
By using the formula of depression in freezing, it can easily identify the rank of the given compounds.

where,
= freezing point depression
i = van 't Hoff factor (number of ions per individual molecule of solute)
m = molality of the solute
= molal freezing point
According to question, if concentration (m) and
is same, then only van 't Hoff factor will change.
For
, i = 2
For
, i = 4
For
, i= 3
Now, the solute with the largest i value results in low freezing point.
The highest value of i is 4 (
), thus
has lowest freezing point.
And,
has highest freezing point.
The order of freezing point is : 
Answer:
Parenchyma is the most simple and specialized tissue which is concerned mainly with the vegetative activities of the plant. The cells are isodiametric with well-developed intercellular spaces, vacuolated cytoplasm and cellulosic cell wall.
Collenchyma is the tissue of the primary body. The cells of the tissue contain protoplasm and are living without intercellular spaces. The cell wall articulate at the corners and are made up of cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin.
Sclerenchyma is the thick-walled cell tissue. In the beginning, the cell is living and have protoplasm, but due to deposition of impermeable secondary board lignin, they become dead thick and hard.
Answer:Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some could tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors. When the authors inquired, they received this letter:
Explanation:
i do not own my copyrights