Answer:
D
Explanation:
Water in itself is a bad conductor of electricity. Any compound that dissociates in water into ions and charged molecules, will increase conductivity of water. In this case ionic compounds weak basis and acids will put in free ions into the water. The ions can pass electricity because they are attracted to respective poles of electricity depending on their charges. In water, these ions are free moving unlike when they are immobilized in their lattice in solid form.
Organic compounds are mainly made of covalent bonds (around carbon) hence do not dissociate in water.
Answer:
Subtract the kinetic energy at the bottom from the potential energy loss. The remainder becomes frictional heat.
Potential energy loss:
M g H = 21.7*9.81*3.5 = 745.1 J
Kinetic energy at bottom of slide:
= (1/2) M v^2 = 52.5 J
Answer:
25N
Explanation:
100 - 75 = 25
That should be right if im not dumb...
We make a graphic of this problem to define the angle.
The angle we can calculate through triangle relation, that is,

With this function we should only calculate the derivate in function of c

That is the rate of change of
.
b) At this point we need only make a substitution of 0 for c in the equation previously found.

Hence we have finally the rate of change when c=0.
Answer:
The change in kinetic energy (KE) of the car is more in the second case.
Explanation:
Let the mass of the car = m
initial velocity of the first case, u = 22 km/h = 6.11 m/s
final velocity of the first case, v = 32 km/h = 8.89 m/s
change in kinetic energy (K.E) = ¹/₂m(v² - u²)
ΔK.E = ¹/₂m(8.89² - 6.11²)
= 20.85m J
initial velocity of the second case, u = 32 km/h = 8.89 m/s
final velocity of the second case, v = 42 km/h = 11.67 m/s
change in kinetic energy (K.E) = ¹/₂m(v² - u²)
ΔK.E = ¹/₂m(11.67² - 8.89²)
= 28.58m J
The change in kinetic energy (KE) of the car is more in the second case.