Answer:
Hello first one is 4.
Second one is 8
Step-by-step explanation:
First one is f(0). It means you should put zero in the place of x
0 is less than 5 so you should put zero in x+4=f(x)
For the second one do like the first one.
I hope you understand
If I remember correctly judging from the 30 in the top left all you would have to is subtract 180 which is the angle of a straight line and subtract it from the 30 and it would be 150
6a. By the convolution theorem,

6b. Similarly,

7. Take the Laplace transform of both sides, noting that the integral is the convolution of
and
.


where
. Then
, and

We have the partial fraction decomposition,

Then we can easily compute the inverse transform to solve for f(t) :


Answer:they still need to make 563 or more. They still need to make more than 563
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Test statistic = -2.44
There is enough evidence to support the strategist's claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : p = 0.41
H1 : p < 0.41
pˆ = 0.38
Test statistic :
z=pˆ−p/√p(1−p)/n
Z = (0.38 - 0.41) / √(0.41(1 - 0.41) / 1600
Z = - 0.03 / √0.0001511875
Z = - 0.03 / 0.0122958
Z = - 2.4399
Test statistic = -2.44
The Pvalue :
P(Z < -2.44) = 0.0073436
α - level = 0.02
If Pvalue < α ; Reject H0
0.0073436 < 0.02 ; We reject H0
Since Pvalue < α ; Hence, There is enough evidence to support the strategist's claim.