Will make Brainliest, 50 pts!

HELP PLEASE! Please explain Slovin's formula

ycow [4]

Answer:

I need more information, meaning his formula.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLZ I REALLY NEED HELP/ i'll give brainlist and 100 points PLZZZZZ

andrew11 [14]

Answer:

Question 1: Answer would be A.

Question 2: Answer would be B.

Question 3: I cannot answer this one because an image is not provided. I do not have the image of the original triangle LMN. If you message me with a photo of this question, I will be able to answer.

Question 4: This answer may be wrong, but I believe that it would be A. I don't know how to calculate dilation transformations, but after graphing out all the points, I found that (6,4) would be the correct point because the distance between Point S and (6,4) is even and is able to be divided by two.

Question 5: Again, I cannot answer this one because an image is provided. Message me with a photo, I'll answer.

Question 6: Answer would be C.

Question 7: Again, I cannot answer this one because an image is provided. Message me with a photo, I'll answer.

Question 8: Answer would be C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Question 1 Explanation: Answer would be A because the quadrilateral was rotated 180 degrees and dilated to be larger.

Question 2 Explanation: Quadrant IV is on the bottom right, Quadrant I is on the top right. If a triangle were to be rotated from the origin (0,0), it would have to rotate 270 degrees in order to reach Quadrant I.

Question 3 Explanation:

Question 4 Explanation:

Question 5 Explanation:

Question 6 Explanation: Using a rotation calculator, I input the degree of rotation as -90.

Question 7 Explanation:

Question 8 Explanation: Using a rotation calculator, I input the degree of rotation as -180.

7 0

3 years ago

3.625 x 10−4 Question 2 options: .3625 36,250 0.0003625

disa [49]

Answer:

0.0003625

:) Hope that helps :)

3 0

3 years ago

Gibbs Baby Food Company wishes to compare the weight gain of infants using its brand versus its competitor’s. A sample of 40 bab

Leviafan [203]

Answer:

$z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936$

The p value can be founded with this formula:

$p_v =P(z$

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

$\bar X_{1}=7.6$ represent the mean for Gibbs products

$\bar X_{2}=8.1$ represent the mean for the competitor

$\sigma_{1}=2.3$ represent the population standard deviation for Gibbs

$\sigma_{2}=2.9$ represent the sample standard deviation for the competitor

$n_{1}=40$ sample size for the group Gibbs

$n_{2}=55$ sample size for the group competitor

$\alpha=0.05$ Significance level provided

z would represent the statistic

Hypothesis to verify

We want to check if babies using the Gibbs brand gained less weight, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}=0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}< 0$

The statistic would be given by:

$z=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ (1)

Replacing the info given we got:

$z=\frac{(7.6-8.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{2.3^2}{40}+\frac{2.9^2}{55}}}}=-0.936$

The p value can be founded with this formula:

$p_v =P(z$

Since the p value is higher than the significance level provided of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can't conclude that the true mean for the Gibbs brand is significantly lower than the true mean for the competitor

5 0

3 years ago

HELP Combining like terms solve all please :) c

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

11. x = -16

12. k = 6

13. x = -19

14. x = -6

15. x = -20

16. Combining like terms isn't to be used on this type of problem. I'm sorry, can you guess on this one?

17. x = 19

18. n = -10

19. b = 11

20. n = 4

21. r = -6

22. n = -4

Again super sorry about question 16 :(

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers