All categories

3 years ago

Which statement is true about crystal lattice energy?

Physics

2 answers:

irinina [24]3 years ago

3 0

The answer is:

It is a measure of the strength of the bonds between ions.

Lattice energy is an estimate of the strength of the bonds formed by ionic compounds.

The first two choices are wrong because it is actually the opposite.

As the ion size increases, lattice energy <u>decreases</u>.

As charge of ions increases, lattice energy <u>increases</u>

As for the other third option, it is wrong because lattice energy is the energy RELEASED not absorbed.

BabaBlast [244]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: The correct option is:

It is a measure of the strength of the bonds between ions.

Explanation:

Lattice energy is defined as amount of energy released on the formation of one mole of crystalline solid from gaseous ions.It is also defined as energy required to break the 1 mole of crystalline solid into its constituting ions in gaseous state that is strength between the ions.

It depends upon two factors:

With increase in charge on the ion the lattice energy increases.
With increase in the size of the ions the lattice energy decreases.

So, from the given options the correct statement is:

It is a measure of the strength of the bonds between ions.

You might be interested in

With the frequency set at the mid-point of the slider and the amplitude set at the mid-point of the slider, approximately how ma

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

The wavelength stays the same.

Explanation:

When the amplitude is increased, the wavelength stays the same.

Here the wavelength doesn't depend upon the amplitude.

4 0

3 years ago

A high power line carries a current of 1.0 kA. What is the strength of the magnetic field this line produces at the ground, 10 m

solmaris [256]

Answer:

The strength of the magnetic field that the line produces is $2x10^{-5} Tesla$ .

Explanation:

From Biot-Savart law, the equation to determine the strength of the magnetic field for any straight wire can be deduced:

$B = \frac{\mu_{0}I}{2\pi r}$ (1)

Where $\mu_{0}$ is the permiability constant, I is the current and r is the distance from the wire.

Notice that it is necessary to express the current, I, from kiloampere to ampere.

$I = 1.0kA \cdot \frac{1000A}{1kA}$ ⇒ $1000A$

Finally, equation 1 can be used:

$B = \frac{(4\pi x10^{-7}T.m/A)(1000A)}{2\pi (10m)}$

$B = 2x10^{-5}T$

Hence, the strength of the magnetic field that the line produces is $2x10^{-5} Tesla$ .

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose you could fit 100 dimes, end to end, between your card with the pinhole and your dime-sized sunball. how many suns could

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: 100 suns

Explanation:

We can solve this with the following relation:

$\frac{d}{x_{sunball-pinhole}}=\frac{D}{x_{sun-pinhole}}$

Where:

$d=17.91 mm =17.91(10)^{-3} m$ is the diameter of a dime

$D$ is the diameter of the Sun

$x_{sun-pinhole}=150,000,000 km=1.5(10)^{11} m$ is the distance between the Sun and the pinhole

$x_{sunball-pinhole}=100 d=1.791 m$ is the amount of dimes that fit in a distance between the sunball and the pinhole

Finding $D$ :

$D=\frac{d}{x_{sunball-pinhole}}x_{sun-pinhole}$

$D=\frac{17.91(10)^{-3} m}{1.791 m} 1.5(10)^{11} m$

$D=1.5(10)^{9} m$ This is roughly the diameter of the Sun

Now, the distance between the Earth and the Sun is one astronomical unit (1 AU), which is equal to:

$1 AU=149,597,870,700 m$

So, we have to divide this distance between $D$ in order to find how many suns could it fit in this distance:

$\frac{149,597,870,700 m}{1.5(10)^{9} m}=99.73 suns \approx 100 suns$

8 0

3 years ago

An airplane flies eastward and always accelerates at a constant rate. At one position along its path it has a velocity of 34.3 m

Tomtit [17]

Explanation:

We'll need two equations.

v² = v₀² + 2a(x - x₀)

where v is the final velocity, v₀ is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, x is the final position, and x₀ is the initial position.

x = x₀ + ½ (v + v₀)t

where t is time.

Given:

v = 47.5 m/s

v₀ = 34.3 m/s

x - x₀ = 40100 m

Find: a and t

(47.5)² = (34.3)² + 2a(40100)

a = 0.0135 m/s²

40100 = ½ (47.5 + 34.3)t

t = 980 s

7 0

3 years ago

Before the experiment, the total momentum of the system is 2.5 kg m/s to the right and the kinetic energy is 5J. After the exper

finlep [7]

Answer:

Option (b) is correct.

Explanation:

Elastic collision is defined as a collision where the kinetic energy of the system remains same. Both linear momentum and kinetic energy are conserved in case of an elastic collision.

Inelastic collision is defined as a collision where kinetic energy of the system is not conserved whereas the linear momentum is conserved. This loss of kinetic energy may due to the conversion to thermal energy or sound energy or may be due to the deformation of the materials colliding with each other.

As given in the problem, before the collision, total momentum of the system is $2.5~Kg~m~s^{-1}$ and the kinetic energy is $5~J$ . After the collision, the total momentum of the system is $2.5~Kg~m~s^{-1}$ , but the kinetic energy is reduced to $4~J$ . So some amount of kinetic energy is lost during the collision.

Therefor the situation describes an inelastic collision (and it could NOT be elastic).

5 0

3 years ago