The errors Emma made are
- She should have used division to represent the quotient of six and x
- She should have used parentheses to show that - 2 is multiplied by (x - 4.5)
<h3>Writing an expression as an equation</h3>
From the question, we are to determine the errors that Emma made
The given statement is
"The quotient of six and a number, x, is the same as negative two times the difference of x and 4.5"
"The quotient of six and a number, x", can be expressed as
6/x
"Two times the difference of x and 4.5", can be expressed as
2(x - 4.5)
Hence, the errors Emma made are
- She should have used division to represent the quotient of six and x
- She should have used parentheses to show that - 2 is multiplied by (x - 4.5)
Learn more on Writing an expression as an equation here: brainly.com/question/13155862
#SPJ1
Both claim that if the two legs (the sides of the right triangle which meet to form 90°) and one of the corresponding acute angles of two right triangles are congruent then the two right triangles are also congruent :) They say the same but in a slightly different way!
I have the same question what grade are you in
This question is about compound interest, but since the interest is such a small number you can use what you know about simple interest to eliminate some answers.
You can immediately eliminate choice A as a clunker, since it is less than the original amount in the account.
Consider what the amount of interest would be if you make the rate much larger than the original rate, say 10%, or 0.1:
$6,500 × 0.1 = $650
If this amount were added to the original amount each year for two years, the total would be:
$6,500 + $650 + $650 = $6,500 + $1,300 = $7,800
This is an over-estimate for the information given, and since choices C and D are even greater than this over-estimate, they can be eliminated. That means choice B is the correct answer.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
for reflection around x-axis.
(x,y)→(x,-y)
so P' is (-7,4)
